User talk:Markreidyhp

All Old talk

Welcome
Welcome  Welcome  Hello, Markreidyhp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check |out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Toddst1 09:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion
Speedy deletion Speedy deletion A tag has been placed on Boyne RFC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per

CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 07:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Oriel Wind Farm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 07:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Boyne RFC
A tag has been placed on Boyne RFC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blair - Speak to me 21:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Blair - Speak to me 21:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of D hotel
A tag has been placed on D hotel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 09:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Funtasia
A tag has been placed on Funtasia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 09:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Laurence Town Centre
A tag has been placed on The Laurence Town Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Laurence Town Centre
The Laurence Town Centre, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Laurence Town Centre satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/The Laurence Town Centre and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of The Laurence Town Centre during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Drogheda Stub Hi Mark! I noticed you have created this category, which was not approved by the stub sorting project. If this is an attempt by you to create a "working list" of possible Drogheda-stub articles, it needs to be moved to your userspace, perhaps as a sub-page (i.e. User:Markreidyhp/Drogheda stubs). As long as it's in category space it's fair game for deletion, even though I'm holding off on that for now. Cheers, Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I won't nominate it for deletion, because I know how strongly you feel about it. But like I said, you should create your own sub-page for it, if you don't want anyone else to delete it. If you don't know how to do that, let me know. Cheers, Her Pegship  (tis herself) 21:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Mark - I have nominated it for deletion. As Peg points out, the right way to do this would be to make a user subpage and simply list the articles there. Creating a category is not the way to go, especially since you've been previously told that in this case one wasn't a good option. Making "manually categorised" stub types (i.e., without a template) also causes extra problems for keeping track of stubs for general stub-sorters, and certainly makes and necessary changes to the categories much harder. Grutness...wha?  23:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Me again - I have created a sub-page for you at User:Markreidyhp/Drogheda stubs. The list will be safe from deletion as it's in your space. Hope this helps - Her Pegship  (tis herself) 16:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Mark - you wrote: what do u mean? I cant categorize all articles relating to Drogheda that have a stub?. Not really, no. The suggestion of a category for Drogheda stubs was rejected when it you proposed it at WP:WSS/P. Youn can, however, list the stubs on a user subpage. Basically, Wikipedia has several different "namespaces" in which pages can be created. Articlespace for articles, categoryspace for categories, userspace for user pages, and so on. Just as people can't write articles on just anything they want to, so categoryspace and some of the other similar spaces are limited to what can be created - that's why there are pages like Categories for deletion, Templates for deletion, and Stub types for deletion. There's more leniency with userspace, though, and users frequently set up pages in userspace for personal projects or similar. It's a much better idea to keep track of stubs relating to Drogheda on a page like that - unless you get enough editors together interested in expanding Drogheda articles to create a WikiProject about the city. Even then, a lot of WikiProjects use a list for their artuicles rather than a stub category. Grutness...wha?  00:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again. You wrote: It is not a stub attempt I'm just finding all the articles relating to drogheda that need a stub.I only ever propeseed a STUB not a category.


 * I think you're getting a little confused by the terminology - looking at WP:STUB should help, but in a nutshell a stub is a short article. Since there is already a long article on Drogheda, there'd be no point in you proposing a stub on it. What you were proposing was a stub type - that is, either a category or template, or combination of the two, to sort stubs about a particular subject - and that is what was rejected when you proposed it. The stub category you created was basically the same thing that was previously rejected. There is no objection to you listing stubs relating to Drogheda on a user subpage, but there should not be a separate category for them. Grutness...wha?  00:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

West Street Drogheda
West Street Another editor has added the  template to the article West Street Drogheda, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Not inapproproate use.
Not inapproproate use. Wikipedia has to clear the sandbox for other people to use, not just for your own purposes. Unknown User (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmmmm, yes, you do seem to have a point there. Sorry about that, my mistake. Unknown User (talk) 08:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Also, at times, it is easier to create your own sandbox. You may call it User:Markreidyhp/Sandbox, to make testing easier for you, however, you have the responsibility to clear it yourself. Unknown User (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, so, in this case, take my advice above. Cheers, Unknown User (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Custom signature
Custom signature It is simple, really. Take a look at this:

Zachary crimsonwolf

If you feel like just copying the format and inserting your username in it, go ahead. However, I suggest that you toy around with the colours and fonts until you've found the ones that suit you. To do so, just replace a font/colour with the one of your choice. For example:

Zachary looks like this:
 * Zachary

If you replace User:Zachary crimsonwolf with User:Markreidyhp, like this:

Markreidyhp
 * The result will be:
 * Markreidyhp

When you change the font:
 * Markreidyhp

The results are:
 * Markreidyhp

Alternatively, you can try it with other fonts, just find one you like. I don't know much about fonts, so you might want to get help in the WP:CP. Ask them which fonts Wikipedia can support.

Now, if you like green, try putting it in:
 * Markreidyhp and you'll get:
 * Markreidyhp

Again, just toy with various colours like midnightblue, lavender, goldenrod, etc, etc.

I hope it helps! Cheers, Zachary  crimsonwolf  12:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Navbar
Navbar

User:Tiddly Tom/navbar - I can do make one if you like, just tell me all your sub-pages you want listed. Tiddly -  Tom  16:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Colours can easily be changed, just drop me a note. Tiddly  -  Tom  19:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the barnstar! Tiddly  -  Tom  13:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Scotch hall
Soctch Hall A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scotch hall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Scotch hall. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:Barnstar
WP:IE Barnstar

Yes. I think that would be a wonderful idea. Feel free to leave me a message if you have anymore messages. Thanks! -  Billy- talk  18:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd recommend using Template:The Original Barnstar. This is the first barnstar and so if the standard for all other barnstars. -  Billy- talk  20:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Think its a great idea. There are more Paddies out there than you'd think! Ceoil (talk) 01:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, barnstars are needed for this project, and many others. Is it just one barnstar you are planning to create? Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 08:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I guess one's enough, esp. as non-IRCer users in the North Atlantic Archipelago don't tend to hand out barnstars so much. I was just thinking of other wikiprojects where barnstars of different degree are handed out, such as for Poland. Can I see what your barnstar looks like? Best, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 11:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

April Fools Joke
Aprils Fools Joke Do I get that in cash, or will you wire it to my bank account on Ellan Vannin? Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 07:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * So you're not gonna give every user on the Irish wikiproject $1,000,000? You dashed my hopes into a thousand pieces! I better contact the manager of my Manx bank account and tell him the 1 mil US is no longer happening. ;) Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 07:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow tanks for the prize, Just send me your bank details and I'll withdraw the money myself sure :) Derry Boi (talk) 10:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

It's a fine April 1st, perhaps too fine... ;) Delux (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow! I never knew there was such a thing as £0.004! Peter Clarke  15:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For real, and I thought this was just another one of those Nigerian 419 scams. What no advance fees? Cool! ww2censor (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA!!! M'hat is doffed in your general direction. There was that split second of "Really?" then the "Wa-a-ait a minute..." so it worked about right. Slán, Pigman ☿ 17:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * What I have to split the EUR 638,442.37 whith these other 5 losers? ;-) Ceoil (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not really very satisfied with this prize. Could I have some spam instead? -- Evertype·✆ 20:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

So, where's my feckin' money!? Send your bank details now, and I have a nice flock of sheep I can sell you. -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 01:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Bertie Ahern
Bertie Ahern Please stop renaming the Trivia section in Bertie Ahern to facts. It's a trivia section, you can't disguise it by changing the name. Snappy56 (talk) 07:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Right on
Right On Really? Your comments cheered me up a bit =) I dislike the classist, traditionalist, isolationist, imperialist leanings of the English, compared to other Europeans. I think that the choices Ireland has taken in things like the EU is a good model for England to follow, particularly for issues that I am concerned with. It is a shame that Ireland is still held up by the UK in some things, like the Schengen Agreement. RossEnglish 20:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of comments from Talk pages
It's very bad form, to delete other people's comments from talkpage, as you did on the Wikiproject Ireland Talkpage, just because you don't like the comment. Please refraine from it in the future. Thanks --Mdebets (talk) 20:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You were the one who deleted it. I added my comment here at 15:02 []. It was still here in this revision at 17:19 [], but it was gone at 19:09 [|19:09]. There were no changes between 17:19 and 19:09. And you were the editor of the 19:09 change, so you did it.
 * And please, don't shout. I'm not deaf. --Mdebets (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop now
Mark, please immediately stop disrupting WikiProject Ireland.


 * You have created two sockpuppets in an attempt to sway the discussions: and
 * You have deleted the comments of other editors
 * You also appear to have moved threads around in the page

Please immediately stop editing that page while we clean it up the damage which you have caused, or you will be blocked. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC) they're not mine they're Davxs ask him! he is my room mate!!! Mark reidy  hp  21:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Markreidyhp for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Mdebets (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

File:Irish Bio stub.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irish Bio stub.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Proposed WP-IE barnstar.jpg


The file File:Proposed WP-IE barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of East Meath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Meath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/East Meath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 07:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)