User talk:Markus0i

Hi Markus, thanks for writing back. I made a few edits to the Brian Baird article, to bring it a little more closely in line with the sources cited in the article. Usually, if several editors can get an article to a stable and balanced state, those editors keep an eye on it and make sure it doesn't degenerate back into partisan bickering. I'm happy to do my part in trying to get to that point; I personally think that's a much better solution than protecting the page, because it's important that Wikipedia remain freely editable wherever possible. Anyway, thanks for your efforts, and for explaining what you're trying to do! Sorry if the message above was a bit impersonal, as you might have guessed the first part is "canned." -Pete (talk) 06:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Markus, this is Genomizer. I don't know why you've written that I deleted years of work when I only added a section, 2006. This was after learning about how this man treated an honest graduate student who looked closely at the deforestation efforts in a statistical study. Of course, all these years later, we know the deforestation was a terrible idea! And it cost about 14 million, was not profitable, and left a wasteland where beautiful forest once stood. I want to make sure this section remains, because this speaks of corruption: Brian was receiving so much money from the logging companies. I know you want to keep only the favorable sections, but the public should know the facts. I will add more references and sources about the incident, if this will appease you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genomizer (talk • contribs) 00:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)