User talk:Markwheeler41

A tag has been placed on Only2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edchilvers 21:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Only2}}}
Hello, Markwheeler41, and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created,, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. Bubba hotep 21:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

From the article's talk page

 * I don't think anyone is doubting its existence. It's just:

Hope this clears it up. Bubba hotep 21:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's been deleted once for failing WP:CORP
 * In its current form, it is blatant advertising

Also
I think it is very interesting that somebody would blatantly remove the name of another company with a valid Wikipedia article, say Home Bargains, and replace it with a link to this article. Like this. Care to comment? Bubba hotep 22:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

And...
I would leave it for now, if I were you. Basically, the fact that the Only2 website doesn't even work is a "non-notability" notifier. And your dogged "enthusiasm" to ensure the article's survival is a sign, in my opinion, of a Conflict of interest. Bubba hotep 22:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I concur. I would suggest cleaning up the spam aspect of the article but it would not survive an WP:AFD anyway.  It's been deleted again BTW.  Please don't recreate it - at least unless it's in some sort of encyclopedic format.  Thanks.  —Wknight94 (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gabby.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gabby.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gabby.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gabby.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)