User talk:Marleec25/Haliclystus auricula

Peer Review
Done-Well


 * Peer nicely updated lead introductory sentence to make it more accurate & informative. Lead is concise.
 * All updated content makes information more accurate & informative, and is presented neutral. Uses a good variety of sources with recent research.
 * I like the way you formatted your updates in the Sandbox; I might steal this method from you, as well as the style of neutrality/tone.

Improvements


 * Could use some sentences briefly introducing article's major sections to give reader more general info.
 * Could possibly find even MORE recent research (2019-2023) to make information more relevant.
 * Maybe some sections could be combined for organizational purposes? (-- maybe Name/Taxonomy, or Name/Description?)

Alyssabaldwin222 (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback! Unfortunately, I couldn't find any more recent research regarding the topic that was peer-reviewed. However, I did my best to add in a few more sentences to introduce the topic and combined a few sections that were similar in content. Marleec25 (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)