User talk:Marlon232

Hey, I see you added a source for that quote but no direct link. and i was unable to find the link while searching croydon guardian. I joined the school in year 7 in 2002 (in the sixth form now) and have never heard of anything like that from anyone. Would you be able to post the direct link to that article? - Thanks

82.44.95.8 (talk) 10:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
WP:Vandalism: "...is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." Please don't mischaracterize edits.  Enigma  message 08:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop doing this.  Enigma  message 22:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid your behaviour has been very suspect. I invited you and others to have a discussion on the matter in the JFS discussion page. You choose not to address the issue at hand but were referring me to your editing history and such.  Twice now you have, without discussion or debate, deleted a mass paragraph.  This follows your removal of an entire paragraph when a user complained about a single sentence.  If you don't want your actions characterised in such a way then please be seen to favour dialogue over mass deletion of text. Thank you Marlon232 (talk) 10:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

stop editwarring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. and my edits are not vandalism.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at The John Fisher School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 20:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. tedder (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I see you're being constructive again, Marlon. Allow me to reiterate my warning from the article talk page. Further disruption will not be tolerated. And no, reverting warnings and calling them vandalism doesn't mean they didn't happen.  Enigma msg  22:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I warned you, and you responded by attacking me. You have been blocked for 48 hours. If your behaviour does not change upon your return, the block will be extended.  Enigma msg  22:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)