User talk:Marmiras

April 10 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

April 9 2015
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Accession of Turkey to the European Union because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Unusual moves
Hello Marmiras. From your move log it looks like you've been trying to move pages between your user space and Wikipedia space. This may create a mess, so please don't do that. If for some reason you want to change your user name, that can be done by posting at WP:CHU/S. If you want to make a draft of a new page, one way to do that is create a subpage in your user spage. For example, User:Marmiras/Sabri Atalay. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Sabri Atalay


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Talk:Sabri Atalay, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avic ennasis @ 07:47, 26 Tishrei 5776 / 07:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

3RR warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Warsaw.  Scr ★ pIron IV 18:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Warsaw. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Warsaw. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Returning to edit war from a block for the behavior is not a wise choice''  Scr ★ pIron IV 17:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Warsaw. DVdm (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dejan Lovren has been undone because it was not constructive. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emile Heskey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Liverpool F.C., you may be blocked from editing. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tottenham Hotspur F.C.. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Manchester United F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

West Ham United F.C. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)