User talk:MarmotteNZ

IEC 60601-1
Hi Marmotte. Thanks for contributing IEC 60601-1 5I've seen your edit summary). However, I'm just  letting  you  know that help.com does not  meet our requirements for WP:RS (reliable source), and that  we strictly  ,need something  else to  prevent a patroller from possibly  flagging  your article for deletion. Is there a pdf for example, of this safety requirement that  you  know of? --Kudpung (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * THX for the feedback Kudpung. for the 601help link, I probably read the guideline for reliable source a bit too fast; I can delete the link, it is not very important. As of a pdf, no of course as the standard itself is copyrighted. I can provide a link towards a draft of the American deviations edition (UL):http://ulstandardsinfonet.ul.com/harm/drafts/medical/s60601-1_1.pdf otherwise there is a good paper here, but not in pdf: http://www.mddionline.com/article/regulatory-strategies-third-edition-iec-60601-1 .  I'll see what I can provide more. THX again--MarmotteNZ (talk) 03:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for looking for more sources. Just  use those URLs as inline references,  and an inline link  to  the PDF that  you  know of. That  way  we are not  reproducing  anything  on  our pages and comitting any  copyright  violation. It's the standard way  to  provide sources, which  of course all  our article must  have. if you  a re not  sure how to  create inline refs, don't  hesitate to ask  me on my  talk  page. Cheers. --Kudpung (talk) 04:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pro-Ject
A tag has been placed on Pro-Ject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 03:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see here: Talk:Pro-Ject--MarmotteNZ (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Discussion about this deletion on Y Talk--MarmotteNZ (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bodhi linux


The article Bodhi linux has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unsourced, no assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yworo (talk) 02:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Bodhi
Bodhi can't possible be notable. It's still in beta and has not yet had a stable production release. The version is 0.1.6 for blarg's sake! Yworo (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

It's not going to be notable until it has had an official stable production release and has then been reviewed by several reliable Linux magazines or sites. Yworo (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Medical Devices regulations
Category:Medical Devices regulations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 07:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Toxoplasma gondii/GA1
It has been over six weeks since you started this review, and have not posted to it since. Are you going to continue, or should we put it back in the reviewing pool for another reviewer to work on? Please let us know as soon as possible. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thx BlueMoonset. Silly question but how do I "release" it ?--MarmotteiNoZ 23:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 75120


The article 75120 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a trivia collection. Unsourced, non notable coincidence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LogoPro-Ject.png
Thanks for uploading File:LogoPro-Ject.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Do not hide major edits as minor
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of Linux audio software, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 00:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Le Peuple de l'Herbe
Hello, MarmotteNZ,

Thanks for creating Le Peuple de l'Herbe! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Connoisseur (Hi-Fi) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connoisseur (Hi-Fi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Connoisseur (Hi-Fi) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 10:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

OneMusic Australia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, OneMusic Australia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 05:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:OneMusic Australia concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OneMusic Australia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:OneMusic Australia concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OneMusic Australia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:OneMusic Australia


Hello, MarmotteNZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OneMusic Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)