User talk:MarnetteD/archive57

2019


Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019

begin it with music and memories

Not too late, I hope ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Not too late at all . Many thanks. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Filling in references
Hi, I saw you filled in some refs at Great chain of being, but without supplying even the title of a review, let alone the page numbers and other details. If you choose to volunteer for such a task, it behoves you to take it seriously, to verify the sources you are citing, and to fill in all the necessary fields of the template. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I run the available programs which have been approved by the community. The work falls within the "short citation" section of Citing sources. There is no requirement that every field be filled. After that anyone is free to enhance the refs after I am done - as you did at that article. Please note that I have taken the work seriously for over two years now and I learned by watching others who made the same kind of edits. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 12:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the RfPP request. I indeed wasn't around and saw I had a fan club hanging out. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You are welcome . Spring scents of Troll-be-GoneRegisteredTM.svg are only a couple months away :-) MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Italia (yacht)
Why am I unable to fix linkrot, but you do it? (example Italia (yacht)--Dthomsen8 (talk) 20:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello . There are some websites used as references that User:Zhaofeng Li/reFill just can't format. I don't know the ins and outs of why this happens. There is a second tool called User:Dispenser/Reflinks that I use on those that refill can't fix. As you can see here it worked in formatting the ref in the Italia article. Still there are some refs that neither program can fix - those have to be done manually. You have to choose a template from these Citation templates and fill them out. Those can be a bit laborious and tricky - working with them over time helps to get used to filling them out. You can also just leave those and another editor who is used to fixing them by hand will come along and take care of things. Best regards and have a pleasant week. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I once was doing the citation forms, but rarely recently. Now I put a URL in . LibraryThing usually does good work on books, but not always. --Dthomsen8 (talk) 03:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know about . Always something new to learn and you have helped with that today! Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 04:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Need help
Hi, i think my account was compromised since i have not reveted 's message. I succeeded in changing my password and for now, i think it's fine. But how can make my account's more reliable ? Thanks in advance for your precious insight. Best regards. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  23:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello . I'm glad you got your password changed. There are things to do that make it more secure but I'm not sure what they are. Maybe one of my talk page watchers can help. You can also try asking for help at the WP:VPMISC. Regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, BTW, my apologies for the bother. I asked Swarm for an insight too. Take care. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  23:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You are welcome . MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Always use a strong password; if you already have a strong password, change it periodically, and always change it when you return to your own machine after using somebody else's to log in - even if you logged out on that other machine.
 * Then there is tw-factor authentication but I get the impression that you need some fancy hardware like a QR code scanner. You also need to write down some security codes (this is what we are told not to do with passwords) because without those you can be locked out. Permanently. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 15:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, my mistake was, i guess, that i never changed my weak password since i'm on Wikipedia (~18 months). I will try to change it every few months at least. Best regards. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  21:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Gareth Griffith-Jones is late on the egg-shaped ball
It's odd - has usually mentioned the Six Nations by now; so instead, I will. It began last night with France v. Wales, and continues today. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 15:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . GG-J did send me an email this morning. After years of getting only one match a weekend (BBCAmerica) or getting them tape delayed (Bein Sports) the tournament has been picked up by NBCSports. Last year their coverage of the Winter Olympics meant I still missed several matches but this year they are all on live - rubs hands together in glee!! Last night was a remarkable comeback. Today's England v Ireland match should be a treat. Each year the question is will Italy ever win even one :-) Thanks for you post here and in the thread just above. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

What a great first weekend! Watched all three, and now, with every Great Britain team winning their first match, it can only get better. Ireland's performance mystified me ... was not expecting that. Cheers to you both! Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Good morning Michael and ,

Wales have reported a clean bill of health today. Full-back Liam Williams was the major concern after leaving the field with a cut head. Neil Jenkins, Wales kicking coach, said, "Most of the boys have come through without serious injury and I would say everybody will be okay for Saturday." Full-back Leigh Halfpenny is still ruled out for these first two games due to ongoing concussion concerns after suffering a head blow against Australia on 10 November. Cheers! Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Monday update


 * Thanks for the update . Leigh has so much mileage on his body and skull I worry for his health down the road. Ireland's lackluster play truly was a mystery. I wonder if a defending champion playing at home has had such a flat first match. Enjoy your week. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

The Sustainability Initiative
Hello : An invitation for you to check out the Sustainability Initiative, which aims to reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia projects. If you're interested, please consider adding your name to the list of supporters, which serves to express and denote the community's support of the initiative. Thanks for your consideration! North America1000 10:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Samuel Beckett's Endgame
I appreciate your bringing to my attention the fact that I forgot to provide a reference for my addition; that has been rectified.TonyPS214 16:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

RIP AF
I just read the very sad news of Albert Finney's passing. Truly one of the greats. Thanks for all the wonderful performances. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * One of the greatest actors to have never won an Oscar. His performance in Scrooge is one of my all-time favorite interpretations of that role, ranking side by side with Alistair Sims. His understated handling of Roberts' boss in Erin Brockovich was outstanding.  What a group of incredible performances in that category for the Oscar that year (and ironic that Finney was also in Traffic, for which Del Torro won). I really thought he was robbed for The Dresser. Of course his portrayal of Hercule Poirot set the standard for that role in Murder on the Orient Express, and he was brilliant in Under the Volcano (which I am surprised at the lack of quality of that article). Two of his lesser known films I also enjoyed greatly were Delivering Milo and The Big Fish. While he hasn't acted in years, his passing is still sad. But luckily we have all his films. Onel 5969  TT me 11:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your post . I agree with everything you've written. Scrooge is my favorite (and my sister's) as well - It is the only version I know of that manages to get the word coffin nail (see my Xmas card of 2017 if it is in your archives) into the story - although it is a scene that is not in the book. The story I've read is that he was performing on a London stage while filming MotOE. Each night after the final curtain he was bundled into an ambulance which had been converted into a makeup room and was transformed into Poirot on the way to the film set. Another favorite of mine is The Green Man (TV serial). It is available on Youtube if you are interested. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the alert, M. A fine and incredibly memorable actor, who will be missed. In addition to those works cited by Onel5969, I would like to add A Rather English Marriage, where he paired again with Tom Courtenay to brilliant effect. Also a great John Newton in Amazing Grace, and a great Churchill in The Gathering Storm. Also the kitchen-sink Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. -- Softlavender (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Excellent choices all . This gives me a chance to mention A Man of No Importance (film) which is another wonderful performance. When I was very young I used to get Albert and Tom mixed up in my memory, thus, I was very happy when they performed together. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Leigh Halfpenny update
Hi Michael! Leigh returns to the Wales training squad tomorrow after being fully tested during a Scarlets training match. Wayne Pivac, his Scarlets boss, said, "He did everything. Full contact. Full tackling. We had a mini-game scenario with no hiding places and he was taking high balls, getting clattered and did everything that he needed to do." Leigh's team mate, fly-half Rhys Patchell is also fit following his December hamstring injury. Pivac is waiting to hear whether the pair will be released by Wales to travel to Italy on Saturday for the match against Benetton Rugby in the Pro14. Hope you're having a good week, Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update . That is good news. The timing is just right as well. Things are shaping up for the match against England to be a classic. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * How about Newport County v. Manchester City? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This kind of FA Cup match is fun . Sadly, here in the US, they moved that tourney to an ESPN streaming service and I haven't gotten to see a single match. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I mention it not just because Newport are the lowest-placed club still in it, but also because GGJ is from not too far away. The two league clubs closest to his home are Cardiff City and Newport County, which are fierce rivals. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Leigh Halfpenny will miss Scarlets' Pro14 match at Benetton on Saturday after suffering a setback in his return from concussion. This is very bad news. Hope you are having a good weekend. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah rats . Thanks for letting me know. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you . This is much appreciated. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

WALL-E
I disagree. There is no disambiguation page. Would a person be able to find the information now that you moved it? I had a note which I should have added more detail to, which I made when reading an actual newspaper, and today I had the opportunity to search that newspaper using a resource not normally available to me. The newspaper's web site cannot be used to find this. And I had to guess which newspaper, based on a list I made of articles that didn't come up when I searched the various newspapers' web sites. Yes, I get lazy when writing stuff down as I read actual newspapers.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  18:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I was not complaining about you or your edits . As stated at WP:HATNOTES they are used since a "Readers may have arrived at the article containing the hatnote because they sought article and the article with the hatnote have similar names or are otherwise easy to confuse." There is no way a reader can confuse Mars Cube One with WALL-E. Also "Mention other topics and articles only if there is a reasonable possibility of a reader arriving at the article either by mistake or with another topic in mind" I do not see how a reader will wind up at the article using Wikipedia's search function. As an example the Snoopy article does not have a hatnote directing a reader to Apollo 10. Another problem is that the mention of Wall-E in the Mars Cube One article does not occur until the second paragraph of the Overview section so it is not easy to determine how that article has any connection to the film. That is why I suggested that a fuller explanation in prose might better suit both articles purposes. This is just one editors thoughts and you could get more input by posting at Wikipedia talk:Hatnote or WP:VPM. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Like I said, I was in a very unusual situation where a normal Google search would have been of no help. A disambiguation page would have been helpful there, and finding only "WALL-E" with just those hatnotes would not have helped. But having that one resource which allowed me to look at several newspapers showed me what I was looking for. If your solution is helpful for someone in that situation, maybe it will work.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  16:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, the hatnote talk page might be the place to say this but this is not the only time I've added to hatnotes or created them for situations like this. Songs with lyrics that are not the title are another example. If a person went to the article for the song that actually has the title, or to a disambiguation page, it would be helpful to have the correct title.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  16:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No response on the hatnote talk page, but it's generally the case when an editor disagrees with me that the other editor is right.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  14:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . I'm sorry you didn't get any responses at that talk page. It could be that not many editors have it on their watchlist anymore. You could still try the WP:VPM. So much around here is the way differewnt editors interpret the policies and guidelines. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Didn't work. It's not a common situation. If I do something wrong, someone will probably tell me.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  19:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update . Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

All is True review
Hey. I thought you might be interested in this. I've been writing online film reviews for a while now, and I just posted a review of Kenneth Branagh's disappointing All Is True. Don't feel under any obligation to read it, but it's there if you fancy having a look. Bertaut (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for sharing this . I appreciate your thoughts on the film. Your description of the references to Will's plays in the film brings to mind this film Molière (2007 film) which does the same thing. I was also glad for your summing up of Branagh's career as a director. He has turned out to have an interesting mix of genres and styles over the years. I'm thinking of having a viewing (when it is released on DVD) where I combine AiT with Will Shakespeare (TV series). Back in November I did that with Wilde (film) and The Happy Prince (2018 film) and found the combination most interesting and thought provoking. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Cat question


Hi.

At Special:Diff/884403673, you removed the two categories Category:Films set in the 1870s and Category:Films set in the 19th century from Little Men (1998 film). While I understand removal of the latter, since the former category is in it, what was the reason to remove the former one? Thanks. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 01:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

I also didn't understand removal of Category:Sony Pictures films in Special:Diff/884441881 at Holmes & Watson, Special:Diff/884441902 at RoboCop (2014 film) – the infoboxes say "Distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing" and the category is described as "Movies released by Sony Pictures." Does this not include distribution? There are similar edits for Category:Columbia Pictures films, Category:Fox Searchlight Pictures films, etc. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 01:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello . The Little Men removal was a mistake and I have restored the cats. As to your second paragraph if you click on the link in my edit summary WikiProject Film/Categorization you will see item 4 reads "by studio – this is exclusively for the studio(s) that produced the film". This goes with the instructions at WP:CATDEF where it states "A central concept used in categorising articles is that of the defining characteristics of a subject of the article" - so the point is that the company that produces a film is a defining characteristic since they are involved with all aspects of its creation - the company that distributes it is not. Except in the case where the production company also distributes it the distributor only gets involved after the film is finished. Now this only applies to the category. Mention of the distributor in articles about films and in list articles for the companies is fine. Regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. So, it's not useful to also categorize the distributors of the film, for the purpose of answering questions like "what films has Sony distributed"? Is there some other way to answer that question easily (i.e. for a non-technical user)? —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 14:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This came up because I came upon, who added those categories, and is continuing to do so. It might be worth giving them that more detailed explanation before requesting admin action. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 14:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello again . Please read WP:CATVER again. Categories are about defining characteristics. As to your question about "what films has Sony distributed" a list article like List of New Line Cinema films is perfectly acceptable for that info. Thanks for the update about the IP. I will leave them a message. There is an editor who was blocked fr creating socks to add just this kind of stuff to articles but, hopefully, this is not them. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pic . Quite often when discussing CATegories my imagination envisions real cats and now you have provided a cute one for this thread. Much appreciated. Meow. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 00:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

FYI, I reported the IP at AIV since they've kept it up and refuse to engage. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 13:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks . I see that they have been blocked. Your vigilance is much appreciated. Be aware they do tend to move on to other IPs so you may see the same kind of problem edits in the future. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

The Big Bang Theory
Do you watch the show? If you did you would see all the celebrities in tonight's episode. If not, go watch it or feel free to look up it up. It is not "up to me". You're the one who wants the information, so haven't you found it yet? Since I'm apparently either a liar or making it as I go along. Mickeydee15 (talk) 04:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to read WP:RS. You must provide one when making entries at Wikipedia. This is not facebook. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 04:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I've mentioned the guideline WP:BURDEN on Mickeydee15's talk page.—Bagumba (talk) 09:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Bloomberg refs: "Are you a robot?"
Thank you again for your help turning bare URLs into full citations!

Just a quick note to let you know that the Bloomberg URLs you addressed in this edit weren't turned into full citations. Instead, Bloomberg seems to have directed you to some kind of CAPTCHA, the details of which ended up in the citation template instead of the desired geographical information. Not sure how best to address this, but you might want to have a look at any other Bloomberg bare URLs that you processed, too, just in case. Zazpot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you . I had not had that happen before. I've fixed the refs in question AND I know to look for it in the future so I really appreciate you letting me know about this. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 06:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Greetings from Wales
The daffodil is the national flower worn on St David's Day (1 March) in Wales. The daffodil may be known as cenhinen Bedr (Saint Peter's leek) I know I'm a week too early, but I hope to put some cheer on your talk. For what it's worth, I always enjoy your humour. Don't let the B*s*a*d* grind you down! All the best! Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much ! The daffodil hats that some of the fans wear are a hoot :-) I'm eagerly awaiting tomorrows match. Thanks also for the compliment. There seem to be more B*s*a*d* doing more grinding than ever so any smiles that we can share are worth the effort. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

You will be missed
I usually post about actors who have left us but I must note the passing of Stanley Donen. So many wonderful and innovative musicals. Two for the Road (film) and Bedazzled (1967 film) are two non-musical delights. His 1997 Oscar acceptance speech is a mark of how much fun he had making films. RIP Stanley. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hillbillyholiday
I'm no expert on Wikipedia - but tell me this isn't the banned user Hillbillyholiday:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MarchOrDie

Same brash manner and obsession with Daily Mail etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wothappenedthere (talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have any diffs to point at? And let me add that I also remove Daily Mail references, and MarnetteD has a brash manner--OK maybe not that. But that account has been here for a while. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your post . I only interacted with H when he was still an editor in good standing. I'm afraid I have to wonder why an editor with twelve edits in two years is posting about this on my talk page. WP:SPI is thataway. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No need. He's gone.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you . MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 I figured this would happen--and I'm dying to know who this was. Drmies (talk) 03:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Oops, blimey
Thanks for this - total accident, yes! Sheesh. Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to know that If someone could figure out how to stop that wiki-screenjump that causes so many misclicks I'd give 'em a Nobel Prize :-) MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I might not go that far but I'd definitely contribute a strawberry yoghurt! DBaK (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

User:188hnsd
Hi a quick look at the brief editing history  and user page of User:188hnsd strongly suggests they're a sock of Azul411. Just in case you also think the same — best, Darouet (talk) 23:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello . I'm pretty sure that DVdm agrees since they opened this Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411. Hopefully that report will be investigated sooner rather than later. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Whoops, sorry I missed that — thank you! -Darouet (talk) 00:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 * No worries . It was a little confusing since DVdm's edit summary linked to the archive page for the SPI rather than the active investigation page. I think DVdm was anticipating the day when the new report would get archived. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 00:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Spot on . - DVdm (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for the backup on Christine (novel). I've informed as they blocked the IP previously for exactly this behavior, but they're currently inactive it seems. I've also just filed a report at AIV, though I don't know whether that was appropriate (IP immediately resuming behavior they were previously blocked for seems blockable to me?). Anywho, thanks again! DonIago (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You are welcome . I'm winding my evening down so I hope at least one of your posts will help solve things by the time I return. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 05:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

SpaceX
Hi. I'm sure you've seen the latest space news. There's more than a hint of 2001 in the pics!  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There sure is . Thanks for the link. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Troll
Hi MarnetteD. You put a note on about him being possibly a VXFC sockpuppet. I'm not sure that's right as it's not VXFC's style, this seems more like the racist troll. Can the account be blocked? I don't know how to request that. Many thanks, --Viennese Waltz 08:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You could be right (BTW I think your user name is great - it reminds me of when I learned to play Tales from the Vienna Woods on the piano as a youngster) VX has been active again recently and the two do crossover at times. As that editor has only made that one edit I don't know if an admin will block them though you could report at AIV and see what happens. The one thing you can do is add that name to the list at Long-term abuse/Ref Desk Antisemitic Troll. Also feel free to change the name on the possible sockpuppet tag that I added.  Thanks for your vigilance and best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 15:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * You are welcome and thank you for this barnstar. I found the history of the painting to be fascinating. I'm glad you asked the question since it helped me to learn something new. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Requesting comment
There is a question on the Savannah Smiles article for a proposed change. No one has made any comments yet. As you are an editor that has shown an interest in the article I wanted to invite you to comment on the article’s Talk Page. Thanks for your consideration. AliciaZag13 (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary! From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you . A little over 14 years ago I heard an item on NPR about WikiP and thought I'd give it a try. Look what that lead too :-) MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for bare url cleanup, and an aside
I would have put this in an edit comment, but there wasn't another edit to make thanks to your work. That said, where you noted in your edit comment that "that is not a formatted reference - it is an EL" I should point out that Template:Cleanup bare URLs does not make such a distinction: "A bare URL is a link to a website with no identifying information except the link itself. It is not just a citation style that leaves the URL visible to the reader." In fact, it uses precisely "" as an example of when to apply that template, whether in the references or elsewhere. Anyway, thanks for fixing it so the template is no longer needed. --Geoff Capp (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That makes little difference . When an editor runs refill any item not in the tags is ignored. Those of us that work cleaning up Bare URL's look in the ref section but no one is going to go hunting through an article to locate item(s) that are only ELs. If you find these in the future it would be a big help if you place the item in the ref tags. The way you used the edit summary was also a help but using the ref tags would save a edits for both people. Now you don't have to do this it is just that it would be helpful. Happy editing and have a nice weekend. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a quick FYI this instruction Template:Cleanup bare URLs states that there is a fix step that an editor is supposed to do before adding the bare url template. There may be editors that follow that but I haven't encountered any. I did see one IP get blocked for not doing it though. In any event that fix also does not work on urls that aren't in ref tags either. Isn't this when we start to feel red tape coiling around our ankles :-) Regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If they're not enclosed in  tags and also are not in one of the bottom sections, WP:ELPOINTS no. 2 applies: With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for mentioning that . MarnetteD&#124;Talk 08:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Refill
Hi, there appears to be a problem with the refill edits filling in invalid dates. This edit added a date of 2 April 8008 and this change added 2 April 9802. Would be worth checking through other edits to see if there are similar problems. Keith D (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . That is certainly weird and I haven't seen it do that before. I'll keep an eye on any more that I use refill on. You might post about this at User talk:Zhaofeng Li/reFill if you want. Thanks for fixing those as well. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I have added a note on the Refill page to see if there is something that links the 2 edits and can be fixed. Keith D (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Good deal . Enjoy the rest of your week. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, dear friend.
Thank you for your support during this difficult time. By the way the John Quarmby article needs adjustment. It talks about Quarmby being happy at being paid fifty pounds for a role, but it doesn't make clear to the average reader that fifty pounds in 1974 was worth a lot more in purchasing power than fifty pounds in 2019. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the late reply . I was happy to help. As to the JQ article I am not seeing the item you mention. I can suggest that you add some refs to support the info that is there if you have the time. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 06:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The item was edited out by another user as unecyclopediac. But, yeah, you don't see much understanding of how inflation applies to money in olden times. Im Enid Blyton's sixth Malory Towers book, a pupil is expelled for stealing five pounds from the Matron. But ONE pound when the book was written is worth sixty pounds in 2019, so you can see why stealing five pounds is a big reason the girl was expelled. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)