User talk:Marniem8437

Speedy deletion of Iota alpha pi
A tag has been placed on Iota alpha pi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  13:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Achoth
A tag has been placed on Achoth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. User A1 (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pi delta kappa
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pi delta kappa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Pi delta kappa – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Lambda Omega sorority Norroena listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lambda Omega sorority Norroena. Since you had some involvement with the Lambda Omega sorority Norroena redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Naraht (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

"Alpha Sigma Delta sorority" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alpha Sigma Delta sorority. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

I'm cleaning up a duplicate redirect, as there are two for Alpha Sigma Delta:
 * Alpha Sigma Delta (sorority) - the preferable one
 * Alpha Sigma Delta sorority - the unnecessary one, now that Lambda Omega has its own article.

This matter is up for discussion, and I'm alerting you as you had participated in creating the earlier version, long before we fully wrote out several articles for Lambda Omega and Theta Upsilon. Probably not controversial, once you look at it. Jax MN (talk) 02:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)