User talk:Marokwitz/Archives/2011/October

Notice
Your summary at Price Tag Policy that you were 'cleaning up' is inexact. You did not touch the issues raised on the talk page. If you wish to 'clean up' please address the serious points raised there, that the text written by Curious Gnome, and the text before I edited, not only did not correspond to the sources cited, but flagrantly distorted them to make points not in those sources. I.e. WP:OR violations. Thank you. Nishidani (talk) 09:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The edit tagged as cleanup was purely cleanup. Check again. In the other edit, I certainly did address the tags by adding a relevant reliable source. It appears that you didn't read carefully. And B'tselem is not a reliable source suitable for encyclopedic use without attribution, just like the Israeli government is not. By now you should know that. Marokwitz (talk) 10:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you are POV-pushing. Of 12 sources I have gathered 3 mention Palestinian violence as an element in retaliatory strategy, 9 do not mention it. You have showcased it, on the basis of one source that fits your POV, and ignored the others. This will require me now to give the full list of citations to the lead definition, if only to show that you are cherry-picking the evidence to slant the article.
 * Assertions are not arguments, your private opinion is worth nothing compared to the consensus of wikipedia editors. Nishidani (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You haven't the slightest idea what my private opinion is, and should really stop these insane accusations. Marokwitz (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Noisetier agian
Saw your note on FT2's page, and I agree, it's obvious that it is the same user. Check out my evidence here: - you may want to add your own, before his usual wikilawyers popup with "oh its just that FBBN again, lets just block her". Foo Bar Buzz Netz (talk) 19:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Her ? Let's just block her ? 81.247.176.156 (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Really, I am not permitted to modify that message, but when the IP of that user makes the same modification you are allowed to revert them? Get off it. You complained the message is misleading, and when that is corrected you complain that it is no longer misleading? Just so you can claim the user is "operating undercover" in an insulting note on their talk page? Try this with somebody else, it wont work with me.  nableezy  - 21:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How do you know it is the IP of that user? Marokwitz (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Because I do. And apparently you think so as well. You really trying to play both sides here? In one place claiming that the user is "socking" as the IP, and in another claiming that the user is not the IP and so the IP cannot modify the user's talk page?  nableezy  - 21:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. I think that the user needs to openly declare that he is Noisetier, and only then should be permitted to edit Noisetier's comments. Marokwitz (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

2011 Israel-Hamas prisoner exchange
Please help me expand and improve this important article. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 03:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)