User talk:Marsupialist

Welcome!
Hello, Marsupialist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558735995 your edit] to Mutiny on the Bounty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Homestead Strike changes
Hi, I saw your additions to this article. I see this is copied from the article on Henry Clay Frick. You should move the citations over, too. An article like this should have everything cited, because it addresses a controversial event. Thanks!!! - Tim1965 (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

article cleanup tags
Thank you for your contributions and efforts to improve Wikipedia!

I notice in Whitman massacre you inserted inline wikitext like claimed by whom? and by whom? which renders as claimed by whom? and by whom?. While these make it apparent to the lay reader that something is "wrong" with the article, they do not make it easy for an editor wishing to find such shortcomings. Instead of an ad hoc method like this, please use and its family of cleanup templates. This places the article in categories which editors can use to find articles. The family of templates are:

Thanks again! —EncMstr (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Marsupialist says thanks
Thank you, I've been searching for those templates for ages! marsupialist 22:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hydro Majestic Hotel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jack Johnson and Tommy Burns. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi, Marsupialist,

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! 220  of  Borg 13:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aimee Semple McPherson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)