User talk:Martha1991

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mary Eberstadt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mary Eberstadt was changed by Martha1991 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975471 on 2014-10-10T19:41:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Martha1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2014
Hello, I'm DrFleischman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mary Eberstadt because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mary Eberstadt. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Upon further review, perhaps this wasn't edit warring, I'm not sure. My apologies for jumping the gun. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Mary Eberstadt does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mary Eberstadt, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)