User talk:MarthaChapter

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanya g (british singer)


A tag has been placed on Tanya g (british singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tanyag.co.uk/#!. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MarthaChapter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Tanya g (british singer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Advice
You wrote on the talk page: "I am the Project Co-ordinator on the label Tanya is signed to." That gives you a WP:Conflict of interest, and you should read that page and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You will see that you should not edit directly about Tanya g, but may submit a draft for consideration by uninvolved users.

You also wrote "I just wanted the information on her website and wikipedia page to be similar." I'm afraid that means that you do not understand what an encyclopedia is. Wikipedia is not just another social-media site or a free advertising platform, and the sort of material an artist puts on her own website would be quite unsuitable. Read User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for some background.

If you want to proceed, collect independent references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." They are necessary to establish Notability (see also WP:MUSICBIO), and also because the Verifiability policy is that "all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources."

Read WP:Your first article for advice, and use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process. Write about what she has actually achieved, with no glowing adjectives, no opinions, just plain facts backed up by reliable sources.

I'm sorry if this is more difficult than you expected, but if Wikipedia allowed people to post copies of their own websites, it would be no more use than Facebook as a work of reference. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)