User talk:Marthamalfoy

Speedy deletion of Eclipse (Warriors)
A tag has been placed on Eclipse (Warriors) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 03:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Secrets of the Clans
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Secrets of the Clans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cunard (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Discuss First
Please, do not make edits like this one without first disscussing it on the talkpage where I have brought it up. Thanks, ~ Bella   Swan ? 02:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Cats of the Clans
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cats of the Clans, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Cats-of-the-Clans/Erin-Hunter/e/9780061458569. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Eclipse (Warriors)
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Eclipse (Warriors) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Eclipse (Warriors) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Cunard (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop adding the "other" sections to the Warriors articles. Consensus is that they are not appropriate for the articles. YOu have been reverted again and again, so please stop. Metros (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This is your final warning. If you continue to add these "other" sections, you will be blocked.  Thank you, Metros (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Metros (talk) 21:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Once again you have been blocked for adding these sections to articles. This block is for one week.  When your block expires please do not add these "other" sections to the Warriors articles.  Thank you, Metros (talk) 22:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)