User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2010/December

The Signpost: 6 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Userfy
Can you userfy Doom10 for me? Redsandro (talk) 18:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Done &rarr; User:Redsandro/sandbox. &mdash; RHaworth 18:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Drtonyriviera
RE:Edit, what are your plans if user does not respond to your question? Jeepday (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Depends on his further editing behaviour. I don't see high activity, so we'll be in time to stop possible further vandalism. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Based on edit history it will probably be hours before another edit, you may as well remove him from AIV. Jeepday (talk) 15:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * True. Sombody else beat me to it though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * After resumed disruptive editing, he has been given a 48 hour block by user:Nlu. If no response follows, and disruptions continues, this should be a VOA indefblock methinks. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Just a note that you might have missed over this. He has been asked previously for sources for his edits, and he has never responded. He refuses to be engaged in any conversation and when he sees the block expired, he'll do it again. I think the 48 hour ban here will not make any difference either. Dragonfire X (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * if user:Nlu is okay with it, I'd say overturn and go for an indefblock right now then. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I also concur with the indefblock, I left a not at User_talk:Nlu, Jeepday (talk) 11:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I do not oppose it. I gave the 48 hour block because I think a block is needed and I didn't personally believe that an indefinite block was yet warranted, but I'm not going to say that I'd be upset over an indefinite block.  --Nlu (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for concern
thank you for your concern i dont know why this user: Active Banana    (bananaphone, is still vandalizing the articles that i contribute in Regine Velasquez and other regine velasquez related articles, if you gonna review the history of these articles from aug 2010 up to now. this banana user editing too much the article that i mentioned. he's always putting some templates in the article even though not totally needed. i'm just follwing the editing styles of the articles such as Mariah Carey Beyonce etc. they're also considered as fan sites but active banana still making Regine Velasquez article a TRASH, instead of helping his fellow wikipedian (me) he's still making shame in his fellow wikipedian. and how can we banned active banana in edit wars? he's also in  edit wars with other users in this wiki encyclopedia. thank you! and god bless! :)) Russart_1999 (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)