User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2011/September

The Signpost: 05 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Unblock request from the list
Hello Martijn. I notice you've been trying to help out the user from the above IP who has posted unblock-en-l. I won't mention their name or organization. This is from a range that was blocked recently by HelloAnnyong per Sockpuppet investigations/Noisetier. It seems unlikely that the person on the list is the same as Noisetier, who appears to be a pusher of unusual views on certain articles about the Middle East. I think it would be OK to create an account for the person on the list. Is that OK with you? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, absolutely. Gmail has been a little weird for me recently, by splitting up some threads that clearly belong together, or marking some messages to a thread as spam, when they are clearly not, so if I broke a conversation in a weird way my apologies for that. In case it's a corp user (I can't quickly remember which one it was), I always try to clearly let them know that editing for corporations is difficult bordering to impossible, and point them to WP:COI, WP:NOSHARE and WP:CORPNAME beforehand. It seems unreasonable to, when they ask for an account, accommodate them without comment, and the moment they start editing covering them in the inevitable mountains of warnings for not following those guidelines. As a new member, I would take a polite unblock for a member of a corporation as an endorsement of corporate editing too. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Frederick Glaysher
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC) -->

Following the instructions, I'm letting you know of this Deletion Review.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Frederick_Glaysher

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_21

The Signpost: 26 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)