User talk:Martijn Koning IIT/sandbox

Taylor: Hi, I'm just gonna jot my peer reviewing comments here if that's alright. 1. Maybe add the actual numbers when you mention "just over half of males and even less of females" or something to that effect. It would make it more specific and also some people think over half is a decent chance, so the phrasing is a bit leaning towards it being not that much when not everyone sees it that way. 2. Watch your use of "male" and "man" as well as "female" and "women" interchangeably. This is admittedly largely an issue for me because I'm nonbinary but it really is a simple fix using "man" when you mean man and "male" when you mean male. Ex: Masters and Johnson would be 800 men and 600 women instead of males and females. I know people in the studies are largely cis but it's still helpful. 3. Maybe add some of the specifics of the effects? I don't know if that info is available but just like what particular differences there are. I don't know if it's anything other than it just feeling better but it would be interesting to know the details and/or any drawbacks 4. How can the reduction in sperm count be reversed?
 * Hello! I think it's perfectly fine to leave your comments here. In fact, I believe that is what we are supposed to do. I appreciate your comments.
 * 1. Agreed. I will add in the actual numbers for this.
 * 2. Thank you for pointing this out. I definitely should have paid more attention to this. My apologies. I will make the changes.
 * 3. I will go through my sources and see if I can be more specific regarding the effects. It may be difficult since research is limited.
 * 4. Good question! I wondered the same thing, as my source did not specify. I assume the sperm count will be reversed by reducing or eliminating marijuana use, but I did not want to enter put my assumptions on the page. I will attempt to track down the source of the citation and explain how it can be reversed.
 * Martijn Koning IIT (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hannah Lux peer review: 1. I would try to include more information, you only have one or two sentences from each source. 2. There could be better statistics being used, "over half" or "less than half" aren't really good statistics in regards to research. 3. A gap you could fill is going more in depth into the vaginal lubrication aspect, why does that happen? 4. Another gap is getting more details on reducing sperm count, better statistics on that. When talking about a medical topic you need to support with more evidence. 5. Something that would improve your evidence would be having quotes from actual doctors or quote what institution your research came from.
 * Hello Hannah! Thank you for your comments.
 * 1. I will try to expand on some items while keeping it concise.
 * 2. Agreed. Will add in the figures.
 * 3. Would you please clarify what you mean? Marijuana use does not increase vaginal lubrication per my sources. I don't know what else can be said about this.
 * 4. I will attempt to track down the statistics. My source did not provide much detail.
 * 5. If I find such quotes I will certainly do that.
 * Martijn Koning IIT (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)