User talk:MartinHarper/Archive 1

Regarding the article sexual desire
Hello, i was reading the article Sexual desire of which you are a contributor,Sir..Under the para PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING SEXUAL DESIRE i was expecting the find something about the 'time that has passed from the previous ejaculation in men'(being the reason that during the short term abstinence in sexually active men, they feel a high urge to indulge in sexual activities) affects their sexual desire..but there is no mention of the specific thing in the article..i have been anxious about this as i have to continue my research project on libido.. Sir, can you please help me find out the reason for why could i not find this fact here..many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 08:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I recommend you research the issue and, after finding the appropriate references, add the information to the article. You can also discuss at Talk:Sexual desire. Martin (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Sir.. How can i know who wrote about factors affecting sexual desire..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 12:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Nazi gun control
Hey, in working on a recent arbcom case, I found your diff from 2003. the "nazi's used gun control" is the subject of a very big debate currently, and you might want to drop in and give some historical perspective. Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun_control/Evidence Gaijin42 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've removed your name, because of the edit you've made ... you're not really *missing* because we know where you are. :-) Graham 87 06:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear Martin,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. Nice to see that you've not completely left us.

Best regards, —  Scott  •  talk  18:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Knowledge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knowledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Knowledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Old sockpuppet case
Also regarding 2003 stuff, and as someone who probably interacted with both, what do you think of the theory that User:Mark Richards was a EoT sockpuppet? Mostly of historical interest now. Funny how many other "suspects" there were, is there even one list of them all? Probably not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.95.94 (talk • contribs) at 00:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilingualism
Hello MartinHarper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bilingualism for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rampage470 (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

List of articles about unsolved problems listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of articles about unsolved problems. Since you had some involvement with the List of articles about unsolved problems redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Capitals of the Netherlands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capitals of the Netherlands. Since you had some involvement with the Capitals of the Netherlands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Lists of people by occupation
Lists of people by occupation, which you created, is being discussed for deletion. Softlavender (talk) 09:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anarchists (film)


The article Anarchists (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since 2004. Single review in Rotten Tomatoes, no additional reviews/sources to take from the Korean WP article. Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) No suitable redirect targets."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 01:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

A cookie for you!


SandSsandwich has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

SandSsandwich (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cc-sa
Template:Cc-sa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. B (talk) 19:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Gender feminism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gender feminism. Since you had some involvement with the Gender feminism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  SITH   (talk)   20:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Images of Rachel Corrie listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Images of Rachel Corrie. Since you had some involvement with the Images of Rachel Corrie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  03:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

"Why Aren't These Pages Copyedited" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Why Aren&. Since you had some involvement with the Why Aren't These Pages Copyedited redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Deletion review
Wikipedia:Deletion review, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion review& and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Deletion review during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

"Capi (temporary)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Capi (temporary). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Greetings
Sending a mote of warmth and reminiscence. I hope you are faring well! – SJ + 15:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kielsky


A tag has been placed on User:Kielsky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/pure junk" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/pure junk and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

"Fuckfest" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fuckfest and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

"Go (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Go (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Extraterritorial crossroad


The article Extraterritorial crossroad has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Most of the sources I found were likely copied from this article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Extraterritorial crossroad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extraterritorial crossroad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Extraterritorial crossroad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 02:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cc-sa
Template:Cc-sa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. House Blaster talk 23:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)