User talk:Martin Bravenboer

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stratego Logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stratego Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LALR Parser Generator


The article LALR Parser Generator has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of LALR Parser Generator for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LALR Parser Generator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/LALR Parser Generator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 19:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Lexerless Parser
If you are still around I have in interest in the Lexerless parsing artical. I wrote a compiler-compiler system that has a Lexerless parser programming language a long long time ago. In the mid 1970s it was used to write a COBOL compiler. The parser language is a decendent of Dewey Val Schorre's META II language. It is vary close to CWIC's SYNTAX language. Schorre was part of the CWIC development team at SDC. From my understanding these were the among first generally available parsers. META II in 1963. Presented in a 1964 ACM meating. CWIC was presented in an ACM SEGPLAN meating in 1969. A 1970 paper is available from the ACM archives.

From my point of view the Schorre scannerless parser programming languages simplify parser development. I was head of the programming language development group at KONTRON in Irvine Calif. I left when the moved to northern Calif in the 80s. From personal experience I can say parser generators having separate lexers are far more difficult to use. Just having two separate programs is a complication. I see you haven't been active for a while. Get in touch if you are interested.Steamerandy (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stratego Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Stratego Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)