User talk:Martin Buber

Discussion Page
Martin B.

Please discuss any future edits on the article's discussion page first. Most of your edits have been tried and reverted numerous times before. The article has reached a certain level of consensus language that most agree on. Please honor the work that has gone into this article in the past.

Cecfan 00:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, actually
Martin,

Being the person who de-stubbed the CEC article and solicited outside edits to it when it was embroiled in less controversy, I can attest to the fact that the article is largely run by CEC faithful who have annihilated its hard-won, fragile consensus, even vocally opposing edits with the full understanding that they were factually accurate, based on their concerns about the repercussions that the distribution of the knowledge would have for the communion.

I respectfully disagree with Cecfan, and thank you for not having become too jaded to work on the article.

Kennethmyers 21:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Let's be honest
I want to thank Ken for his remarks. It is my contention that so many persons on both sides of the CEC debate have contributed (or uncontributed) to this article, that it is only honest for both sides to admit that the neutrality of this article is in question.--Martin Buber 16:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)