User talk:Martin Hogbin/Archive 13

Arbitration statement
Hi, Martin Hogbin. I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). Thank you for making a statement in an arbitration request at Arbitration/Requests/Case. However, we ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Your statement significantly exceeds this limit. Please reduce the length of your statement when you are next online. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence; and concise, factual statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the Arbitrators.

Requests for extensions of the word limit may be made either in your statement or by email to the Committee through this link or if email is not available through your account.

For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias (T)(C) 10:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem. It looked to me that the case had started but I will remove my additional material. Martin Hogbin (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have done it now and parked my comments in my user space for now. Is it OK at this stage to have a link to them on the Arbcom page? Martin Hogbin (talk) 11:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom case request
Longstanding POV and behaviour dispute at veganism, a case request in which you are involved, has been declined as unready for arbitration at this time. For the Arbitration Committee,  Mini  apolis  20:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement
Hi Martin, I created an essay regarding the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement on Meta and I am now looking for ideas regarding the project. I saw that you're interested in sustainability, so I'd love to hear your comments and maybe even have your support! Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for Comments regarding faith healing and pseudoscience
Hello, you previously participated in a request for comments regarding whether faith healing and whether it is a pseudoscience. I would like to inform you that there is currently an open request for comments that is revisiting this question that you might be interested in participating in. I am notifying everybody who participated in the previous request for comments.-- Literaturegeek |  T@1k?  09:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)