User talk:Martin Moritzi

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Mycorrhiza, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I can't understand your repeated arguments about my attempt to state a fact about mycorrhiza. I see that I can still work on my encyclopaedic writing style. But I did not use any copyrighted material for my statements, the sources are all open access. How many of my sentence elements could be called copied in the process, I don't know, but "extensive text" is certainly not. How did you come to your judgement? But well, maybe I'll try another topic sometime. Thanks for the exchange. (Martin Moritzi (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC))

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Martin Moritzi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I do not see a conflict of interest (COI) as you have suspected. In fact, I work in one of the research institutes (WSL) that manages one cited source (Waldwissen.net) and I know the researchers I mentioned (which is why I know about the research results that I considered relevant for Wikipedia). But I was not mandated or paid to describe these research results in Wikipedia. Can one even speak of COI in context with the dissemination of scientific findings (open access)?
 * (Martin Moritzi (talk) 14:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC))