User talk:Martin Saints

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Roberta Murgo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hey Mid  (contributions) 16:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Roberta Murgo constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Kgasso (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Roberta Murgo
Martin, if you believe there is a factual error with the Roberta Murgo article, please follow the procedures described at Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject). Note however that the subject of an article does not own or control that article; while we strive very hard to ensure biographical articles are well sourced, balanced, and that we respect the privacy of genuinely non-public individuals, we don't allow subjects or their representatives to dictate the contents of articles. I strongly suggest you describe, in detail, what issues you have with the article on its associated discussion page, talk:Roberta Murgo. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 16:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Further, if you are Roberta Murgo's agent or other official representative (as the text of edit summaries you've left strongly suggest) it's often a wise idea to provide evidence of that by email (such emails are treated confidentially by trustworthy people), as described at the "How to e-mail us" section of Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject). If you are not an official representative, but simply a fan, please make sure not to give the impression here that you are.  We occasionally get problems with people pretending to be, or to represent, celebrities, and we're sometimes forced to block those people from editing, as their actions reflect badly on the actual person. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 16:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)