User talk:Martine Fulling/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The Wikipedia article on Attack ads was extremely thorough. The citations were neutral and reliable taken from journals, newspapers, and scholars. The jargon within the article was also all linked to their wikipedia pages explaining their meaning. The article also has fairly recent facts and sources used, dating from 2013, that bring relevance to "attack ads". However, there could be more information highlighting attack ads in regards to the latest presidental election of Donald Trump and his opponenent Hillary Clinton to update the page and make it more relevant. Overall, the web page was extremely informative with reliable sources used, proper citations, and links to help explain the jargon used. What information could be added to this page in order to make it more current and relevant to society today?