User talk:Martinfud

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. In particular, all of the links you erroneously deleted on spurious grounds are to articles about or actually written by Peter Power. Your actions cannot be construed as anything other than malicious vandalism, and any further examples will be dealt with accordingly. Nick Cooper (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Can I respond: I only removed the links as I suspect the julyseventh campaign will add their own amongst them to suit their own vendetta against Power. That seems contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia? If you represent Wikipedia as opposed to the people now wishing to add to this article (?) I would very much like to make the case directly for not actually changing anything at all - from the original article that existed for many months and was only added to a few days/weeks ago by the julyseventh campaign to suit their purposes. I believe their addition added nothing whatsoever to the article and was borne only of malicious intent. Therefore, I seek only to keep that was before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinfud (talk • contribs) 17:38, 14 February 2008

Peter Power (crisis management specialist)
While some of your removals were legitimate editorial decisions, you removed a lot more than could be justified by your arguments. The BBC, for example, is usually considered an exemplary source. CIreland (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I have protected this article for 3 days and I invite you to express your opinions at Talk:Peter Power (crisis management specialist). CIreland (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)