User talk:Martini833

Image tagging for Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply
I'm not upset with you; learning Wikipedia's policies in the face of many experienced editors who are discussing removing your contributions is undoubtedly frustrating. My statement was that it has no third party sources, not that it's an advertisement. One good point in the discussion was that while MySpace and the bands are notable, the sponsorship of the shows by others through MySpace isn't necessarily notable. I'm sorry that you feel that your time has been wasted. Leebo T / C  22:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It sounds like you're saying some combination of "it should have an article because it has a fanbase" and "it should have an article because many other non-notable articles exist", neither of which are valid arguments. It's not that I "have it out" for your article. It came up on the log deletion discussions (there are hundreds every day) and I commented in it. I'm not running around blindly looking for articles to delete. You can see, I have contributed several new articles myself. I looked at the article and asked myself if it meets Wikipedia's policies and I felt it didn't and explained myself. If you disagree, that's fine, but I expect an argument ground in the same policies. Leebo T / C  22:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * People have done that to me (See:Articles for deletion/DynaMed). It's called disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Leebo T / C  22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I gave my opinion, I'm not sure what else there is to say. I'm not sure either why you singled me out to ask all of these questions, it wasn't me who nominated your article for deletion. I'm only one of many who commented. Leebo T / C  22:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

JuJube nominated the article. His comment is the one at the very top of the discussion. You may have noticed mine first because I bold my name in my signature, and as the first commenter I started my post with the bolded Delete (the nominator doesn't because it's assumed that he's saying Delete). It probably would have been courteous for him to leave you a note telling you the discussion was taking place, but there's not much that can be done about that now. Leebo T / C  22:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Blanking the discussion
I'm not sure if you did this by accident, but make sure you don't do it again. The discussion is permanent and repeated removal of other editors comments will be considered vandalism. Leebo</b> <sup style="color:#B22222;">T / C  23:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The discussion has to go for 5 days before an administrator will close it. The AfD template may not be removed from the article. I have no say in this, it's Wikipedia policy. Someone else will reinstate the discussion if I don't. <b style="color:CornflowerBlue;">Leebo</b> <sup style="color:#B22222;">T / C  23:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Joy Berry, Rancho Verde High School

 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. JuJube 00:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 00:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Your article is not a stub, it's spam. There's a difference. JuJube 21:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD at MySpace Secret Shows
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 00:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Regarding this edit: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Sign your comments, please
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Admin
Tell on the administrators? What are you referring to? If you are talking about how I struck your second "keep" !vote in the discussion, that's so that the administrator who closes it can tell that it wasn't 2 different people saying keep. <b style="color:CornflowerBlue;">Leebo</b> <sup style="color:#B22222;">T / C  22:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I just went back and looked at the discussion. I'm sorry I gave you a serious response. Your last comment crossed a line. Please do not message me again if you only wish to make uncivil comments. <b style="color:CornflowerBlue;">Leebo</b> <sup style="color:#B22222;">T / C  22:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

MySpace Secret Shows
I've had to delete this page again as you recreated it shortly after it was deleted according to Articles for deletion/MySpace Secret Shows. If you wish to recreate this article, you should go through Deletion Review. When contributing to Wikipedia, please try to remain civil, it certainly stops people getting their backs up. -- Nick  <sup style="color:blue;">t  19:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Since the page was originally deleted via an AFD, it can be speedy deleted (that is, without warning) if the same content is posted again. That is what happened. If you strongly feel the article meets the notability requirements, then I would suggest that you open a request for the deletion to be reviewed at WP:DRV. Hope this helps.--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(TALK) 20:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Instructions to open a deletion review are listed at Deletion_Review. I'd gladly open a deletion review for you, but first you need to talk to the administrator who deleted the page, and voice your concerns with him. If you are able to convince him that the notability of the article meets those required by Wikipedia (See WP:N ), then he himself will undelete it.


 * Addendum: I see you've already contacted him. Please wait for his reply. I've copied the last revision temporarily to User:Martini833/MySpace Secret Shows, which you can work on meanwhile.--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(TALK) 20:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * An administrator's view is at par with that of a normal editor. Administrators just have access to a few more technical aspects of Wikipedia. As far as I can see, the article has a fair chance of being restored. However, many would recommend it to be merged into MySpace, no doubt.--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(TALK) 20:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * All right then. Go to Deletion review/Log/2007 March 31 and edit the page to add the following at the end:


 * where "REASON" should be replaced with the reason you request the article to be restored. Please remember to remain civil and not to attack the admin who deleted the page, or your views wouldn't be heard in a favourable light.
 * Ping me if you have any difficulties going about this. I'll be online for a few more minutes.--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(TALK) 20:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed the fair use images from this page whilst it resides in user space (it's against policy). You'll need to remove the comments to show the images again. --  Nick  <sup style="color:blue;">t  21:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but if you notice my userspace, you will see that I'm having certain issues that prevent me from interacting much with the community at present. Good luck with the deletion review.--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(TALK) 06:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

MySpace Secret Shows
In regards to your comment on my talk page, I've posted this reply and am copying it here for convenience:


 * I "wanted to delete both entries" since they had issues with third-party proven notability, as explained by numerous other editors on Wikipedia. Contrary to what you may think, if the article is recreated with these issues taken care of, I'll be very happy with it being here.  *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 02:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * That already seems much better than the one that was deleted. I will admit that I have not been editing for too long, so I'm not proficient with images and things yet.  I've mostly been doing wikify and cleanup.  I'll be glad to check the article over for things like that (probably tomorrow).  You might want to use tags in-line with each sentence you are attributing to that source URL, and then use  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.   //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 03:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of BURN-E
I have nominated BURN-E, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/BURN-E. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 03:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

upcoming pixar?
similar names prompt me to ask....? SpikeJones (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * yup Martini833 (talk) 22:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Good for you. No offense intended with this, but now you need to be extra careful to minimize any WP:COI or NPOV edits as there may be fingerpointing about whether you are associated with Pixar or not. Being spotlighted like that means your edits here need to be extra good.  (but you already knew this, of course) SpikeJones (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

How could I be associated with Pixar if I'm writing for an unnoficial blog. But yeah, it's kind of annoying how so many people here assume you're trying to advertie. I've had people accuse me of being a marketing guy from MySpace. Pshhhh/. Well thanks for the warning. :) Martini833 (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * YOU know this, and I know this, but THEY may not. Just be careful... and please pay attention to talk page discussions that you are now directly involved in, such as the JCoM drama on the template page. SpikeJones (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Th whiteblank.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Th whiteblank.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Disney/Pixar listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disney/Pixar. Since you had some involvement with the Disney/Pixar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)