User talk:Martinillo

Speedy deletion nomination of Thai Airways Flight 679


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Thai Airways Flight 679, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 19:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Thai Airways Flight 679 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thai Airways Flight 679 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thai Airways Flight 679 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 19:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Alright, sounds fair! User:Martinillo 20:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Crash articles
Hi Martin, I see you are enjoying Wikipedia. i think it is grest, but there are limitations. The biggest is that the servers are not infinite in size, so we editors have to monitor the input and ensure that articles conform to policies and guidelines. Please do NOT gdet offended if some of your articles get heavily editted or even deleted, this is all part od the process and is definitely not personal. On that note if you ever feel that another editor is making it personal, you should bring your conncerns to the open in the project talk page, where experienced editors / administrators will sort out the problem,

Happy editting. P.S. The Thai airways article just doesn't meet notability guideline and falls foul of other guidelines. Look at it as good practice, one day the right subject will present itself, and you will be readey.--Petebutt (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much, yes I do realize I am still an amateur! Thanks, I really appreciate it :). Happy editing! User:Martinillo (User talk:Martinillo|talk]]) 19:43, 14 September

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573987366 your edit] to Halifax Stanfield International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * hydraulic loader he was using and died on scene.

HELP
Where is the Visual editor, i cant find it? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.191.190 (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. Yes, Visual Editor was temporary and used a beta. It was only on for a certain period of time as a "test". It is no longer available. I hope this answers your question. Please do not vandalize any other pages. Thanks! Martinillo (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the info. could you provide a link for more info, all the pages ive seen say it should still be active. Shouldnt they be deleted or changed to "was" from "is"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.191.190 (talk) 21:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Yep, sure can. And I am unsure if you should because visual editor is still in other countries. You'd have to run that over with an admin. But heres a few links: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Hope this helps!Martinillo (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Undoing Revision of JYP Entertainment
Hello. I saw that you did undid a revision to the page JYP Entertainment in which I took out the list of JYP Entertainment labels. I was following WP:Split for the article. Since there was no objections to the proposal of splitting, I took the liberty of splitting the article into the former and List of JYP Entertainment labels. More specifically, I was following the fourteenth step of the subsection "How to properly split an article." Is there a problem? Thanks! Kkj11210 (talk) 04:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Ohhhh! Yes, I am extremely sorry about undoing your revision on JYP Entertainment. I thought it was vandalism as half of the page was missing! I appreciate you contacting me, as I too, make mistakes! There is no problem, hope you have a good day! Martinillo (talk) 04:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've undid the revisions. Thanks for replying quickly! Kkj11210 (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 1967 Pan American Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Redstone Golf Resort concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Redstone Golf Resort, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Redstone Golf Resort


Hello Martinillo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Redstone Golf Resort".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash; rybec   04:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Regarding your addition to the aircrash article of info sourced to Twitter,, please read WP:RS. Twitter is not considered a reliable source. You can argue your case on the article's talk page, where other editors called for removing Twitter and Youtube as references. Thanks. Edison (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Correct, give you 100% reasoning, thank you for making me informed. Martinillo (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 John F. Kennedy Airport shooting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 John F. Kennedy Airport shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2016 John F. Kennedy Airport shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 02:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that
We were both attempting a content merger at the same time, and given the nature of the event such was to be expected. Raymie (t • c) 07:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

No worries
Lets re vert back to mine, new one seems to have lots of mislead info. Martinillo (t • c) 07:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jessica Fullalove


The article Jessica Fullalove has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 08:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Aerosucre Flight 4544 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aerosucre Flight 4544 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aerosucre Flight 4544 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)