User talk:Martinlomax

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Goshen, Indiana. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 03:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Goshen, Indiana, you may be blocked from editing. If the movie isn't important enough to be mentioned anywhere other than the local paper and a site that is selling it on DvD, it doesn't belong here and your repeated attempts to add it certainly look like promotion. John from Idegon (talk) 03:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Goshen, Indiana. ''Stop edit warring. Discuss on article's talk page and gain a consensus on what if any to include. Do not add this to the article again without consensus. Direct linking to commercial websites is a serious misuse of Wikipedia and you keep re-adding that link, despite it being removed by other editors. This is your last warning.'' John from Idegon (talk) 15:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

This is an incorrect removal by John from Idegon. None of the claims that and backing reasons justify an removal. I know Wikipedia policy and this film and the description fit all requirements and do not match his incorrect claims. I am trying to make Wikipedia accurate. John from Idegon repeated removal of the legitimate and factual content make his motives questionable.