User talk:Martinogk

Adding tags with Page Curation
Please take care not to add duplicate tags as you did at Patricia Chou. Thanks. Pam D  23:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for fixing the mistake.Martinogk (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Heath (probabilist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probabilist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Aminta Granera‎, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The article about Aminta Granera had very limited information, only one reference and some typos. In a sequence of edits of both the English and Spanish version pages, I added key basic information about her and made sure that both articles are properly referenced.

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aminta Granera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anastasio Somoza and La Prensa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peace Brigades International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Willoughby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neernemula, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paddy and Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balangiga massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Balangiga_massacre check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Balangiga_massacre?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shared parenting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Shared_parenting check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Shared_parenting?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Child custody ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Child_custody check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Child_custody?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Visitation
 * Families Need Fathers ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Families_Need_Fathers check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Families_Need_Fathers?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Abduction

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Fathers' rights movement in Italy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fathers%27_rights_movement_in_Italy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fathers%27_rights_movement_in_Italy?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Ascoli and Piceno
 * Fathers' rights movement in Australia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fathers%27_rights_movement_in_Australia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fathers%27_rights_movement_in_Australia?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Visitation

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Martinogk, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a number of women's biographies. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any trouble or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for welcoming me. I appreciate that and your offer of assistance. I have more biographies on my to do list so they will be trickling in. Martinogk (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Non-existent categories
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Canadian Equal Parenting Council, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear Oops! Your advice is good. Unfortunately, I sometimes make mistakes. Thank you for finding and correcting the error! Very much appreciated. Martinogk (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No prob, we all mistakes.  And on a wiki they are easily fixed.
 * However, not all editors know that's a mistake, so I have taken to adding a wee explanation just in case. Hope its tone comes out OK; it's hard to get a single text which works well in all cases. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is the beauty of Wikipedia. I think (i) it is great that you correct the errors and just not complain about them. The latter may push people away from the project. (ii) While it may not be necessary, it is very nice and helpful that you explain your correction on the persons talk page. (iii) It was good that you waited a while before correcting the error, since people do not always do their edits in a logical order. (iv) If you want to work on the tone, you could try the plus/delta feedback approach. Martinogk (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Style
I know it's not of the greatest importance, but if you do not follow conventions,peoplearegoing to have to spend time changing these: Article and book titles go in Italics, and when speaking about the US Parties, Democrat and Republican have capitals. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Equal Parenting Council for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Equal Parenting Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canadian Equal Parenting Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Malin Bergström) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Malin Bergström.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 21:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear Thank you for your suggestion. Very helpful. I have fixed the citation style. Martinogk (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Thoroddur Bjarnason) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Thoroddur Bjarnason.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

Nomination of Leading Women for Shared Parenting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Women for Shared Parenting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leading Women for Shared Parenting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Elizabeth Celi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Celi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Celi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Deletion discussion about Molly Olson
Hello, Martinogk,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Molly Olson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Articles for deletion/Molly Olson.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

National Parents Organization
As I think you know, these days in WP I am much more concerned  about promotionalism  than notability. dThe mostdifficult type of promotionalism to dea lwith is advocac yfor causes that many people would support. It's very hard to write about them in a NPOV fashion--it's easier to be fair towards our enemies, than maintain a proper critical distance from our friends.

The usual difficulties in writing about sympathetic advocacy organizations is to avoid repeatedly quoting or restating their principles, adding making excessive instances of their successes, aand wording what they are trying to accomplish in a neutral manne,r rather than in words caluclated to sound universally appealing.

I have just reworked National Parents Organization to try to deal with these problems. I hope you will understand that what I have done is what I think would make it a more effective article, not to try to dimish its importance..

We have discussed this before, on my user talk at. with respect to Ned Holstein--as the article had not been improved, I made some rather extensive cuts, removing material which taled not about him, but were examples of the positions he advocates. .

In particular, I have problem with the phrase in this and related articles "those who believe children do best when they have a healthy relationship with both their mother and their father. "  This catch phrase is worded to prejudice the issue--those who would oppose shared parenting either in general or in particular instances are likely to believe that the results of a divorce are very apt to be so bitter as to prevent such healthy relationship. (I don't think I have any axe to grind here--I am apparently quite old-fashioned in some ways for someone who considers himself a social libertarian, for I cannot think of a situation among either my relatives or my close friends of a divorce involving children. ) It's easier to look at this objectively when one is not involved. What I think the best way to handle it is to not use such a phrase more than once an article, and if possible, only in a quoted policy statement. "Shared parenting" is I think the neutral phrase. (Need I point out that the earlier term for this was Men's rights, implying that conventional policy in this area was to favor the woman; this is, of course, rather different from the view of most feminist organizations, which have historically been concerned with situations where the bias is in the other direction, in particular the long-standing view that sexually active divorced women are unfit mothers).

Please don't change back what I have done without very careful consideration Rather, consider whether you would do well   to make simialr changes in some other of your articles.  DGG ( talk ) 08:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Thank you for participating in Women in Red
Hi there, Martinogk. I am sorry to see you no longer intend to contribute to Women in Red but would like to thank you for the many biographies you created up to early 2019. On the other hand, it's good to see you are happier contributing articles about Nicaragua to the Swedish and Spanish wikis. I take to heart your comments on the problems you encountered in connection with the English version of Wikipedia. Over the years, we have been trying to make the site more welcoming to editors but it has not always been easy. The articles in our Press and Research sections reveal the difficulties we face. Please drop me a line if ever you think I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind words. Much appreciated. Martinogk (talk) 17:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)