User talk:Martinphi/diffs

ScienceApologist:

What, praytell, is so goddamn controversial about that statement?

Personal attack on my talk page:

Martin, you are so well practiced in double-speak that I find this response to be so outrageously evasive and duplicitous as to be almost not worth reply.

Clarivoyance diffs:

Fyslee:
 * In violation of ArbCom
 * quack "scientists" don't count


 * 


 * 

Mccready:



See also edit summary accusation of sock puppetry:



Please use the talk page? As if he had?



Threatens another ArbCom, says I mis-interpret current one, cites minority-definition source which the article does not contain:



Accuses of 3RR, as if a uninvolved party, and removes sources:



ASTRAL PROJECTION:

Svetovid:





Pseudoscientific assertion:



















Finally instead of edit warring, uses a tag: