User talk:Martintowns1995

July 2018
One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 12:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Apprenticeships at Salford City College


A tag has been placed on Apprenticeships at Salford City College, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Connorcp (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FutureSkills at MediaCityUK
Hello, Martintowns1995,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mgbo120 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, FutureSkills at MediaCityUK, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cheers Mgbo120  09:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Apprenticeships at Salford City College. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —teb728 t c 09:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

FutureSkills at MediaCityUK moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, FutureSkills at MediaCityUK, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your edits
As you can see I reverted your edits again as you removed the entire article and replaced it with promotional material. Stop doing this. Please discuss further changes on the talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Eccles College vs. Eccles Sixth Form College
You are destroying the article on Eccles College to write about Eccles Sixth Form College. That's like removing all information we have on the Soviet Union to write about Russia. Don't do that. If Eccles Sixth Form College is notable enough to be the subject of an encyclopedia article, I suggest you use the Article Wizard to create a new draft on that subject. If you damage the article on Eccles College again, you may be blocked from editing. Huon (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * It appears, at a closer look, that Eccles Sixth Form College is post-merger Eccles College, making my "Soviet Union vs Russia" comparison even more apt. If there are reliable sources discussing Eccles College after the merger, you're welcome to improve the article by summarizing what those sources say (or better yet, since you rather obviously have a conflict of interest, propose specific changes on the article's talk page and leave it to uninvolved editors to decide on whether they improve the page). You should also take a look at WP:PAID; that page details the disclosure requirements for paid editors.
 * Removing sourced content about the college's history, however, still is not appropriate. Neither is editing while logged out so you can continue edit warring. Wikipedia resolves disputes by discussion, not by "who can revert the most". Huon (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Pendleton Sixth Form College while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
Your recent editing history at Eccles Sixth Form College and other articles show that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Salford college courses
Hi. You wrote "The page has been setup to introduce information about the college." In other words, to publicise the college. Please be aware of the Wikipedia guidelines on conflicts of interest. Deb (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)