User talk:Martintype

May 2020
Hello Mstallone - The recent contribution I made to the Wearside Jack page is not incorrect, as per your messages above. Whilst I commend you on your quest to keep vandalism on Wikipedia at bay, I do resent being wrongly accused of adding incorrect information when I am in fact correcting a spelling mistake. I've created a new Wearside Jack Talk Section with numerous references to back this up, and would welcome your contribution. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Martintype (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, Martintype! Thank you for your feedback and your contributions to Talk:Wearside Jack with the additional sources! The reverts I had made were based on the spelling from the reference source for that specific claim in the article (citation #20 as it stands currently). A lot of unconstructive edits I see here on Wikipedia introduce incorrect spellings, and I hope you can understand that, without a source correcting the original source in the article, it is easy to assume that your original edits were merely unconstructive edits. In the future, I would highly recommend sourcing additions with the original edits so that Wikipedia users like myself do not assume its vandalism. Again, many thanks for correcting me and updating the article's talk page! All above warnings from myself should be considered invalid. Thanks! Mstallone (talk) 03:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)