User talk:Marty Martinson

April 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Eyferth study. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * That there are serious problems with the Eyferth Study is widely accepted, even by its most famous proponent James Flynn. Jensen was the most prominent intelligence researcher of the twentieth century so to omit his criticisms is wrong. Marty Martinson (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying. Are you aware that we had an RfC on this? See the consensus here. The matter has been settled for now. Cheers, Generalrelative (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Doug Weller talk 15:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)