User talk:Marudubshinki/Archive 41

User notice: test3
Please block this User: 24.242.152.166; he's been warned several times. -- Mahoga ny


 * Done. --maru  (talk)  contribs 20:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Paul Graham
How do you know bugbear is Paul Graham? Nothing in his edit history is smoking gun to me. Sure, his Slashdot id is bugbear, but that's on slashdot, not here. --maru  (talk)  contribs 22:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * He told me. AaronSw 03:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Technically, that's Original Research, but as long as the man himself doesn't show up angry, I guess I'll let it go. --maru  (talk)  contribs 03:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)
You are invited to vote at Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). The issue of the name has not been resolved and therefore people are now recruiting others to delete. Feel free to make your judgement known, thank you. Nomen Nescio 21:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I got this too late. I was going to vote to merge into the Movement article, since all the rationale should be sourceable to proponents in the movement. --maru  (talk)  contribs 23:04, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Deletion in Meme article
Hi Maru, I had a question about your recent edit to the Meme article. You deleted this paragraph:


 * The 'selfish gene' on which the meme is based ignores transcription factors and that only genes that work together are evolutionarily successful. The meme then stands on a metaphor rather than on biological science. 'The Selfish Genes', genes working together promoting the fitness of individuals, fighting for a spot on the team, is a somewhat more apt description of evolution but with this more accurate description of evolution the foundation of memetics is undermined.

Your edit notes simply say "Rv. I disagree". Could you explain what you disagree with on the meme talk page? You may have good reason for not reverting the statement, but I think it would be fair to 24.10.221.159 to have more than a two word rebuttal.

Thanks, mennonot 22:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Quite simply, I disagree with the anon's characteterization of the selfish gene as a "metaphor" and not a reality. While it is trivially true that not all genes can be selfish (since otherwise the organisms would die), that doesn't prove "that only genes that work together are evolutionarily successful", and thus the body of the anon's argument is invalid. --maru  (talk)  contribs 23:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Teika formatting
Remember Fujiwara no Teika? Well, I'm trying to get those nice little boxes you set up to be in the center instead of left-aligning (I've asked around, and people find center aligning better, apparently), but I can't figure out how- the relevant code already says "center". --maru  (talk)  contribs 05:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Aye aye, done. :) -- Cat out 08:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. --maru  (talk)  contribs 13:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Editing: Master Plan
Hello, Marudubshinki, or however you would like to be called... ah, yes. You see, "minor Star Wars ships" was moved to something like "list of minor Star Wars ships". I was going to put the first one under AfD, and uh, had something to do urgently before I could finish it. Anyway, I wasn't familiar with how to do it, so... Anyway, if you could put "minor Star Wars ships" under AfD, I would be grateful. --RelentlessRouge 11:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Just maru is fine. See, I don't like capitals, and the first name is maru, and the last name dubshinki, so in relaxed situations like this, that leaves just "maru".
 * But you don't want to delete that page because that orphans a lot of links. I redirected it instead. --maru  (talk)  contribs 13:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Off-wiki personal attacks poll
Since you have previously participated in discussions about the off-wiki NPA policy, I wanted to let you know about a quick opinion poll that is now posted on the Talk page there. Your input is appreciated!


 * Wikipedia talk:No personal attacks

--Strom 21:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I've voted. --maru  (talk)  contribs 22:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

SW Tables
Dear maradubshinki, or however you would like to be addressed (it was meant as a joke). Hmm. I'll try to right-align them sometime or another... however, I'm not that good, and my time is limited. Could you do it? lol. However, I'll get 2 it sometime or another. --RelentlessRouge


 * Just right-align them as you make'em from now on, and update the un-aligned neutral ones. Remember, no need to get everything done right now. --maru  (talk)  contribs 03:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Revert
Hi there. I just got your message saying that a change I'd made had been reverted. I'm just wondering which page contained the unsatisfactory edits. I'm a little surprised, as my edits have only consisted of things like spelling and grammar corrections. 86.131.85.105 07:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, I've found the page in questin: it was Darth Vader. I'd intended just to delete an extraneous word that had somehow been inserted in the text, but for some reason it deleted the end of the article as well. I certainly didn't do that myself, so I guess there must be a problem somewhere. There was no intention to vandalise the page. Apologies. 86.131.85.105 07:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Your Opinion...
Maru in the past you've helped me so I would like to ask what you think of me running for and admin.? Thanks, Mahoga ny


 * Please don't take this the wrong way, but I wouldn't feel comfortable voting for you. I'm not sure you've learned enough, and I'm made especially uneasy by that series of break-ins into your account. --maru  (talk)  contribs 16:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I understand and wouldn't think you would've voted for me anyways. But I did what you said got a newer computer and better security. Mahoga ny


 * Well, that's not everything. Actually, I keep a list of my criteria, along with my reasoning, here. --maru   (talk)  contribs 20:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)