User talk:Marudubshinki/Archive 44

FYI
I've issued a strongly worded warning to Moby Dick about stalking. This is grounded in remedy 2 of your arbitration case (about harassment by Davenbelle, Stereotek and Fadix). --Tony Sidaway 16:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you!
 * I am curious though if it would be possible to take a few precautions.
 * I'd like to make sure Moby Dick has no "other" sockpuppets lurking around me. If he had like 10 accounts it would be very hard for me to gather any reliable evidence.
 * Possibly keeping logs that make a checkuser possible longer than a month if Moby Dick decides to stalk from a different alias. These logs can be kept on wikimedia servers away from public reach.
 * -- Cat out 17:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * That last would require both a policy and a technical change; it might be nice, but it's unlikely. A number of editors (like myself) are happy to know that if they choose to leave for more than a week (or whatever it takes for Recentchanges to expire here on en) that their IPs will be forgotten. --maru  (talk)  contribs 18:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Recentchanges/IP data expire in a month. I just want the log of Moby Dick to stay longer making it easier to identify his sockpuppets if they appear. It would have been a great help if we had the logs for davenbelle to compare with Moby Dick.
 * As for the sockpuppet check, do you think you can get someone to look into it?
 * -- Cat out 07:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Really? A month? I have to say, I'm kinda surprised. A months' worth of RC must take up an enormous amount of space. But I guess even that wasn't long enough to correlate davenbelle and Moby Dick.
 * As for Checkusering, there's not much I can do besides point you to the Checkuser request pages. But I'll ask Essjay personally the next time I see him on IRC whether he can run a Checkuser for you, if at all possible. --maru  (talk)  contribs 04:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Unauthorized Bot
Hello, it seems that you are running a bot called User:Bot-maru, without any authorization to do so. Please seek approval from WP:BRFA before continuing. Thank you. -- light darkness (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * FYI, I blocked the bot until its problems can be fixed. It now appears there is substantial consensus that it should not edit talk pages, so please don't unblock until you rewrite it to avoid them. (You should also, obviously, deal with the authorization issues as above, but I don't know much about those.) -- SCZenz 17:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I sort of noticed the block when all my programs began failing mysteriously. --maru  (talk)  contribs 18:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Confused about odd redirect
What is this redir for: MediaWiki:VfD-List of computer games featuring exploding sheep? — xaosflux Talk  04:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I was following a link on the Weird-but-good-articles page to List of computer games featuring exploding sheep; it had been up for deletion at some point, and on its talk page, someone had linked to that weird link (I don't know whether it's a relic of the old namespaces for deletion and VFD in particular or just a weird spaz out by the author). Anyway, I had just been at the AFD, so I killed a redlink. --maru  (talk)  contribs 04:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I fixed the redlink at Talk:Exploding sheep and killed the dobule redirect, and the MediaWiki page entry. Looks like a bad template was subst'd in there. — xaosflux  Talk  03:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I make redirects- I don't scrap them. But I wouldn't know about AFD templates; I usually avoid the place. The templates make it too damn difficult a place to work in, and none of the AFD helper scripts seem to work with the blue-cologne skin. --maru  (talk)  contribs 04:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your corrections to one of my subpages
Hey, I'm just leaving a note to say thank you for your wikification of links on my "Things I Like" subpage, and for your notification of the dead link therein. As for the thing about Kisokaido/Tokkaido: yes, I am sure that it's Kisokaido (or Kiso Kaido if you prefer—Kiso Kaido Rokujuku Tsugi), and it's definitely not from the Tokkaido road series. Anyhow, thanks again; I appreciate it. —Saposcat 06:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem. (Well, if you're sure: I knew of The Sixty-nine stages of the Kiso Kaido (not, strictly speaking, entirely Hiroshige's work), but it's just that one sees it mentioned orders of magnitude less than the Tokkaido road series, and it seemed more likely to me to be a mistake.) --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

myg0t mediation
We respectively ask for mediation in regards to your violation of the speedy deletion policy. --OverlordQ 12:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No thanks. I don't know who you want to mediate, what you want to mediate, and I don't think I violated the speedy delete policy (there's a clause for non-notable groups). --maru  (talk)  contribs 18:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I disagree, why speedy delete an article that has been undeleted and often edited? pff..--Andeee 15:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I disagree. Might as well ask why I speedy deleted an article that was speedy deleted often? --maru  (talk)  contribs 17:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * myg0t are absolutely notable. --85.255.33.130 09:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't. And stop changing your posts to look like they are coming from Ifrit. --maru  (talk)  contribs 18:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

More information for Elfsar Comics & Toys
Here is some more information as to why this store is notable:

Elfsar Comics and Toys notably have one of the largest Graphic Novel selections in Canada.

Elfsar Comics and Toys provide the City of Vancouver with over $300.00 worth of reading material each and every month for low income families. Contact: City of Vancouver for verification.

In 2004 Elfsar provided the Ronald McDonald House British Columbia with over $1,600.00 in Donations from it's fundraiser for the first ever International [24 Hour Comic Day http://www.24hourcomics.com/].(where artists and writers gathered together and created 24 page comics in a 24 hour period.

They are an active supporter of local and independent comic book companies/creators and host a number of Comic Creator signings throughout the year. Rosencrantz Comics Signing CSI Miami Signing Arbitrators Signing Neil Gaiman Signing Arcana Studio Signing Huge Creator Signing

Elfsar has been a proud supporter of Free Comic Book Day since it's inception by Joe Field, owner of Flying Colors Comics. On May 6th, 2006 Elfsar Comics and Toys gave away over 7,000 comics from over 40 different titles to the general public during it's participation of Free Comic Book Day. Both Creator Signings and Gamming Tournaments were notable at this event. FCBD at Elfsar

Jay Bardyla Owner of Happy Harbor which is Elfsar Comic & Toy's Sister Store in Edmonton, Alberta received an Honorable Mention for the Joe Shuster Award for Most Outstanding Canadian Comic Retailer for 2006.

If you need more information please contact: Ethan Peacock Owner of Elfsar Collection LTD. (64.46.12.126 07:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC))

Donald Brown - Eamon Creator
Hi Marudubshinki, The Wikipedia.org article "Eamon (computer game)" was already created and contained a link to the author's name, the article for the author however, had not been created. That's what I was trying to do.

When you say "Eamon strikes me as not important enough to merit an article for its creator". How are you deciding that? This is an old game system but age doesn't seem to be a factor of importance for Wikipedia. It was based on the Apple II but that also was pretty important in its time. The Eamon system was not produced commercially, but that was the whole point. The author created a good game system that was open ended and put it in the public domain. If you read the Wikipedia.org article "Eamon (computer game)" you will see that it had a fairly large following and that Donald's original creation had a ripple effect that involved quite a few other people.

By the way, its hard to tell when you write something how others will respond to it. I just want you to know that I am writing this to you intending full respect to you. I'm hoping that you will reconsider and create the article. Thank you for your time. Ted.


 * When I, or most any other person write anything on AFC, declining to create an article, we're just saying that this particular editor whom we happen to be doesn't think it is worth creating an article on. Now, if someone created a half-way decent Eamon article, and it went up on AFD, I would lay better than even odds it wouldn't be deleted, that enough of my fellow editors would find it notable enough under their criterion. You should feel free to start it yourself, or try another editor- I simply don't feel like creating it. --maru  (talk)  contribs 00:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Imagawa Sadayo
Nice edit on my article. I've been searching for as much information on him that I could find, and have added your references to my ever-growing "to-buy" list! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AngusH (talk • contribs)


 * You're quite welcome! Consider it repayment for creating the bulk of the article for me. :) --maru  (talk)  contribs 04:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Request for deletion....
Sorry to bug you, since you are an admin. will you delete my userpage? -- Mahoga ny


 * I don't know why you wanted it deleted, but I've done so. --maru  (talk)  contribs 18:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks; just had some junk that I really didn't want people to know. (Like you know how once upon a time my account was hacked). -- Mahoga ny


 * Ah, I see. Ha ha ha- good times, good times? --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Cleaning up List of Pokémon characters
Can you hit this with your bot, to clean up dabs and redirects? It's just too much to do by hand at this point. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Cleaning up redirects related to lists isn't a particularly good idea, but I'll see what I can do vis-avis disambiguation. The problem is, so far as I know, Pywikipedi's solve-disambiguation script is kinda one-way; that is, one starts with a disambig page and fixes whatever links to it, rather than start with a random page, and fix whatever links in it point to a disambig page. I might be able to compile a list by hand and just do all those disambigs (which would help out other pages as well). --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, I used the extract_wikilinks.py script to get a list of linked articles, and y'know what? There don't seem to be much if at all in the way of links to disambiguations- just a metric ton of duplicated links and redirects, and those are things the bots are not set up to do, and I don't know enough about Python to make them so set up. Sorry. --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

About myg0t
Please, revert your removal. If you're biased, and if you have a little angst to write, then do it into the kitchen trash bin, because admin rights are NOT FOR SUCH. Thank you. And also, please, admit it: you did against admin policies. So please, asking on behalf of nearly every wikipedia, revert your removal of a legitimate article. You also contradicted yourself: "anti-censorship". You always have the right for your own opinion, but if you don't like something then abuse your rights in order to remove it, you CENSOR. So much for internet withou censorship... I would not let you wear any of those userboxes/tags if I would have the if I would have the power to after this...


 * It's not a legitimate article, and it is not against policy. And as far as the tags/userboxes go, just because I believe in free speech doesn't automatically mean there must be no editorial control of Wikipedia! Wikipedia is not a place for articles on anything and everything.

EDIT: I just read through your arguments on the talk page from sections I didn't notice before. 1. Myg0t is notable, this is nothing that you can argue, and is plain stupid to say they are not... 2. Even if an article has been deleted, raped, AFD'd how many times, the version that you deleted was a factual, POV, and a good article (which wasn't seen there before with mostly vandalizing). I finally thought that "people have come to their mind". Which has nothing to do with its history, you do know? It's about the material. For example, if a user keeps vandalizing, and then becomes "clean", does it mean that he has less chances of becoming an admin? No. Besides, I will have to remind you: the only reason the article was previously deleted was because it hadn't established a decent article. As opposed to the one you removed. Really pisses me and many other users off. Come on. "Ass hats?" Why don't you go and also delete articles about jihadists, fascism, nazism, GNAA, and such, because they are "mean" and "assholes", in [your] opinion? I can't comprehend how your mind works. Report this issue to some board or committee or review or whatever... --194.251.240.114 20:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Why is it stupid to say they are not notable? They been passingly and unimportantly mentioned in two or three places (as compared to GNAA, which is mentioned in among other things, the Scotsman and G4TV or whatever that tech channel is), as minor parts of minor events. And by its very Internety and ephemeral nature, that article wasn't particularly factual. And you are wrong about reformed vandals- that's the kiss of death, so to speak. Off-hand, I can't think of a single admin out of the eight or 900 admins who is a reformed vandal. --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Super Dimension Fortress criticism section
I know that you are on the other side for keeping the controversy section in, but I removed the criticism. It's been two months of edit warring over a minor issue, and you did not make any comments on the talk page in your reversions and semiprotection. I respect your status as an admin, but I completely disagree with your involvement and use of protection privileges without engaging in the discussion. T e  k e  20:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your responses on the subject. I edited the controversy to just Some former users have criticized the administration of SDF as high-handed, accusing them of removing accounts, erasing files, defaced their webpages, and deleted bulletin board postings of those critical of SDF's policies and its administration.  I can live with that, I hope everyone else can so we can have peace on our watchlists.  T  e  k e  01:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * As I've said on the talk page, with the addition of the link, I'm happy. If only all disputes could be resolved so easily. I just hope the anon I semi-protected against will be content with this compromise as well. --maru  (talk)  contribs 04:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I think the protection placed by Tony Sidaway can be removed. If the 192.__.__.__ address keeps returning it'll just be reversions now; at least the edit war is over.  I appreciate the civility all around in discussion.   T  e  k e  18:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Huh, you beat me to it by 3 hours, I see. My page musta been cached.  Thanks for watching it.  T  e  k e  02:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I really do pay attention to my talk page, even if I'm busy with other matters. --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Spiral: Suiri no Kizuna
Feel free to remove the tag from Spiral: Suiri no Kizuna if you so desire. The tag was applied because the core of the article &mdash; namely the subsections entitled Blade Children and Characters &mdash; had only one word which was wikified. Of course, it's not do or die, but it immediately struck me that more than half the content of the entry was unwikified.

TTFN. --Folajimi 01:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * That seems reasonable. I'll leave it alone then. --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes
I was wondering if you could re-review the page. We have tried to address your concerns. Did we meet your criteria? :) -- Cat out 15:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Almost. I've modified my vote. --maru  (talk)  contribs 06:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)