User talk:Marvelite787

April 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Marvels. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * That is a bit hypocritical, is it not? This is exactly what you are doing. A group of you are deliberately trying to have content how you see it and then threatening those who you deem are interfering with the information you want presented to the public. I have edited what, 2 lines? No misinformation, nothing derogatory. But you and others have been warring to prevent any changes you do not agree with from happening to the page. Now we have pages like John Carter, 47 Ronin, Jack the Giant Slayer where this is not a problem. They under-performed, thereby they are a box office bomb. Same with the The Marvels. This is what has been used on films like these for years. Why is this now an issue? Is it now offensive to use that label anymore? If so, should not other pages of movies that failed to recoup their budget be edited?
 * If I was interested and actually engaging in a real edit war like you guys have been doing, I can easily create multiple accounts from a myriad of IP addresses to circumvent any block. It's not hard to do. That is not my goal, though. But be aware that your threats and attitude undermine trust in Wikipedia and the information it is presenting, and people will start to notice this. Marvelite787 (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Follow Wikipedia polices and be WP:CIVIL in edits and discussions, and then there would have been no need for this warning to be issued. I am merely upholding the site's policies on sourcing and discussion. Whatever opinions you assume I and others have are baseless and without merit. You are welcome to contribute and work with others, no one is stopping you, and this is not a "threat" as you so call it, but a standard practice warning given out to anyone who violates or is close to violating the site policy on user conduct. Each article is its own from a wide variety of editors and their perspectives, and each have their own unique situations and circumstances. No two films are the same. No two articles are, either. You have been directed to review MOS:ACCLAIMED and WP:HEADLINES in regards to which sources to use and how. I'm not going to be WP:Beating a dead horse with this and repeatedly explain what others have conveyed to you already. Wikipedia is and always strives to be a place of civil, constructive, and critical information gathering and sharing that is verifiable with a neutral point of view citing WP:Reliable sources. That is our goal here, and especially mine. If you disagree, then please research to find sources that qualify in supporting what you want included, rather than making outlandish claims targeting other editors. Focus on the content for our readers, not the people editing them. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at The Marvels. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Bud, I can get around this block without breaking a sweat. We all know you guys are censoring, now stop flogging a dead horse. Marvelite787 (talk) 00:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * After further review, I lifted the block as being unnecessary since you have stopped edit warring, but I would advise against using multiple accounts. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)