User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Rainbow Archer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Vanessa Merrell. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NgYShung (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Qandeel Baloch
Re your message: It looks like the issues related to the article have been resolved. The article has been semi-protected so that should prevent the majority of the vandalism occurring on the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
We're a fairly friendly bunch here, although there is a little bit of a learning curve. Stick with it, you'll enjoy it! =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Millie Bobbie Brown Biography
Thanks for creating this biography following the proposal, appreciated.Twobells (talk) 09:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What proposal? --Rainbow Archer (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

SPI
Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that when dealing with really blatant socking and/or vandalism, it might be better to go to WP:AIV, where the response time is far better. Furthermore, checkusers will nearly never connect IPs with registered accounts. Just wanted to let you know.

Regards,

GABgab 21:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Response
It does not matter. In my personal history, I have received countless warnings for violating 3RR even though my reversions were in good faith and against vandals just like in this case. Finally, a friendly user told me that it was because four reverts is still more than three, no matter the intention, and advised me that if I am already at three reverts, I should wait for other users to join in the fight. Hence why I had to send you the 3RR warning. Parsley Man (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Endre Ady
Hi, I saw that you reverted the last change on the Endre Ady page, and I'd like to understand why. It looks like a good and legitimate link. What am I missing?! Thanks. Nathan43 (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Nathan43 One of his edits were tagged as repeated addition of external links by non-autoconfirmed user. I saw that in recent changes. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * OK thank you. Nathan43 (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your request
is a ✅ sock of. Thanks for the heads up.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Some advice
I notice you delete messages, but hopefully you will read this and take it to heart. When you write an article, it is best to expand upon the subject instead of making a stub whenever possible. Some of your subjects are clearly notable, but editors may not see that if the time and care is not put into the article. If you want to see a real-world example, look at the now blocked CrazyAces489. He was quantity over quality and it bit him in the end (42 deleted articles!). I am not saying I am an expert but I've written over 200 articles and not one has been deleted so take that info as you want to. Trust me, the additional work will payoff in the long run.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I have checked the oldest revisions of some articles, and they were created through two sources during 2010-2014 period. Rainbow Archer (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I am a little confused by this statement. Are you referring to CrazyAces's history of creating articles or something else?TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No, not about Crazyaces. Previously, when I tried to create articles I found that those articles were already created by somebody. I wanted to check the first edits of the history, when the article was created. There I found that in 2012 or 2013, some of those articles were created through two sources only. Rainbow Archer (talk) 07:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well it is not really the sourcing I am concerned about (except with the Afd I started). It is more about how descriptive your own writing is on the subject. For example I write about musical acts. I could probably write a an article in three sentences about the general career of the group. However, I usually write five paragraphs of information give or take for all my articles. It solidifies the fact the subject is notable and I think that it will help your cause to expand some of your past work and continue to be descriptive in future projects.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Millie Brady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Rainbow Archer. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ARainbow_Archer enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 21:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Userpage deletion
Hi, If you ever want any of your user pages deleted just tag them with which is User request - You don't need to send your stuff to MFD :), You may want to install Twinkle as that makes life alot easier here, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Felice Jankell
 * added a link pointing to Swedish


 * Tatjana Vasiljeva
 * added a link pointing to Latvian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Christian Coulson
He is openly gay, and his boyfriend is called Keith Edwards. This is accurate!

His boyfriend's Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/p/w6oe4EJhQh/

Christian is pictured on the right holding the iPhone, kissing his boyfriend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezyie (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Count Paris
Hello Marvellous Spider-Man, i noticed that you reverted revision on count paris page. i believe the one that suspected to have affair is lady capulet (juliet's mom) and tybalt, not juliet .. lady capulet mourn tybalt death twice ( where it said they have been up all night mourning Tybalt's death) while she even not mourn that hard when juliet fake her death ... also shown at "lady capulet alone grieves in a lament; sorrow makes capulet and the nurse speechless 115.178.236.77 115.178.236.77 (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)115.178.236.77115.178.236.77 (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Nthep (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC) c. tenuiflorus is a duplicate of the image on carduus pycnocephalus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susan Dunlap (talk • contribs) 20:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Deutscher Jugendliteraturpreis
Hello, I had updated the page and you deleted the complete revision even though all given data is correct and verfiable. I will undo the deletion and would like to know why it was deleted in the first place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AK Jugendliteratur (talk • contribs) 13:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

vaginismus edit
Hi,

I hope that it is right now..this is my first edit so I am in learning mode — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kudosishere (talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Gorillas
Just FYI, see. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Promotional
Ok...how in the world can the word 'eponymous', meaning something that has a name from a namesake, be in any way called promotional?! Trader Vic's restaurant, which has a wiki page, is named after 'Trader' Vic Bergeron. This is like saying that acknowledging that Trump Tower or Ford Motor Company has the names of their founders is to promote those companies? 31.208.103.192 (talk) 13:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

DC-3 Dakotahunter needs to be on the page as well
Hi,

I don't agree with you. My friend has one of the best blogs about the DC-3. Even his posts on War History Online gets more than 11K likes. Please read his site. He is a DC-3 fan. The other links are of guys he really knows, but his site has the best blog. So please see his website, then you will know this is not a commercial link, but one that deserves to be up there, please see: https://www.dc3dakotahunter.com/dakota-hunter-blog/

Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Douglas DC-3 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eelcowyn (talk • contribs) 20:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

list of coloring books
AMRajaNanthini] Hi We are selling coloring books online and I have added that link in the external link in coloring books space. Its related to the wiki content know then why you removed my link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMRajaNanthini (talk • contribs) 13:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viña Machado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colombian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Sarkes Mkrdichian deletion
I don't see why this should be deleted as there are references and links and more to come Golfworkout (talk) 05:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

A7 for Deshvani
Newspapers are not eligible for speedy A7. Please read the criteria carefully. Thanks. Pam D  07:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

St Rose Music
Hi. I've declined your A7 because I think it passes A7 - with Philip Glass as a founder, and a list that includes Nico Muhly and Tom Waits on the roster. I've tagged it as unreferenced, and am going to have a word with the author about showing notability a bit better. (BTW the edit before yours was Ritchie333 declining a speedy...) Peridon (talk) 16:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Peridon I check options before nominating. I can claim on a page that my company was inaugurated by Abraham Lincoln yesterday. -- Marvellous Spider -Man 16:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy A7 is based on credible claims to significance - actual notability only comes in for prod or AfD. I've left a word for the author, and will chase her up if I don't see anything happening. Peridon (talk) 17:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Psychonautic Sun Deletion
Hi man, my name is Nick Feldman and I'm wondering why you proposed our deletion. Have you looked at how rapidly we are growing in both Facebook and YouTube ? We are a humble band but we are growi g rapidly and have nothing but positivity from fans and even international critics. Please give. Us a chance and don't write us off as irrelevant just yet. M Nickforty6and2 (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Psychonautic Sun Deletion
Also, we just got approved by Pandora (and are waiting to go live), and we are also on Spotify, iTunes, Google Play and more. Fans and critics love us so far so I don't understand why you're so willing to delete us. Nickforty6and2 (talk) 22:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Psychonautic Sun
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E2WQPJ_z4zQ Please observe how quickly we are growing in views, likes and positive comments on a daily basis. Nickforty6and2 (talk) 23:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi Marvellous Spider-Man, just to let you know that i have amended some of your references at Dakota Ditcheva from cite webs to cite news and added the newspaper name to them. ps. i like kittens (and penguins).

Coolabahapple (talk) 11:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 

NPP
Thank you  for your enthusiasm. It would have been helped if a) you  had read the discussions at  WT:NPP where a similar project  has been under discussion  for several  weeks by  experienced  editors in  conjunction  with  improvements to  the Page Curation software that  are being  discussed with  senior staff  at  the WMF, andwho know how to formulate RfC on such critical issues in order to obtain the most appropriate consensus.. Forgive me for saying  so but  I  don't  believe you  are  aware of the issues that  are at  stake here or that  you  have even read WT:NPP. b) Secondly, the VP  is not  the best lace for such a discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

I have now added the essential fro the RfC that was already being prepared. The problem is that by offering the community multiple options, the hat collectors will vote for the solution that changes the least and continues to allow newbies and inexperienced editors to continue as before. I strongly recommend also lauching the RfC correctly at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right, publish it correctly, and notify personally all the users who can legitimately be notified per our policy at WP:Canvass. Best would be to cancel that RfC and start again. You can still take the credit for it. I can help you do this because we now have to save losing two years of preparatory work for something bigger that this is only one part of. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Marvellous Spider-Man. Thank you for your comprehension. I have closed the RfC as you requested. It will take me a few hours to get the other RfC ready and start it on the page you created. We can make the proposal as joint signatories. It will only offer one choice. If they want to consider other options, they will have to go and start their own RfCs. The hardest work for us will be manually notifying everyone who has participated in related discussions. I'll explain how we can share that task, and how you can publish the new RfC correctly. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

I hope I'm doing this right
I don't know why adding the documentary of Citizen Toxie is considered "not constructive" and "disruptive", it is a sister piece to the film and doesnt have its own wikipage. Yes, not everyone needs to watch it to enjoy Citizen Toxie, but it's still an important part of the film and film making, as would any behind the scenes full length documentary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:8340:3CA0:6855:8011:FE1A:C46A (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You are spamming a youtube channel WP:SPAM. Marvellous Spider -Man 16:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

I showed reference.
Although it is Korean language. 211.200.180.250 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I need help with the Animaniacs on home video article
Hi, I was trying to fix the article by adding Animaniacs video releases from 1994 and I kept having a problem with the cite your source for Animaniacs: You WILL Buy This Video!. Can you help me fix this problem and add back the 1994 VHS releases, please? 71.95.61.24 (talk) 00:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks you make alot of sence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoseGherrera6 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Be aware
Thegracefulslick, prhese and paparusa are buddy buddy and work like meat puppets. They almost always support each other. 2607:FB90:2407:9D32:50B9:ED93:A7EA:C8F5 (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi Marvellous Spider-Man, thanks for the thanks for my edit at Articles for deletion/The Princess and the Pony, the reviews weren't very hard to find, and the book looks so cute i just had to have a look for sources.

Coolabahapple (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC) 

ANI
Hi, you left a message which was strikethrough text on my talk page with this title ANI, I'm wondering what that is supposed to mean. Can you please explain--Celestinesucess (talk) 08:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I striked it as ANI report about you, was wrong.


 * I closed the ANI post after User: Rebiing pointed out that, I made mistake by reporting at ANI. I found out some of your patrolled pages with page curation tool was not notable. And there were similar posts by other users also on your talk apge.


 * Your account is 16 months old. I expected other experienced editors will comment in this matter. Rebbing told me to discuss on your talk page, if I find that your page patrol is not right. I shouldn't have taken this matter to ANI. Sorry, my mistake. -- Marvellous Spider -Man 08:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

why
why did u delete my updates. ita so rude. i updated the awards. its vital for a profile info Papiamumtaz (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not delete, it's revert. You should provide some verifiable WP:RS sources. Thank you. -- Marvellous <b style="color:LawnGreen">Spider</b> -Man 08:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 0010x0010 for deletion
Hello <b style="color:Chocolate">Marvellous</b> <b style="color:SandyBrown">Spider</b> -Man, 0010x0010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. He is labeled audiovisual artist and not specifically musician or director (although google search results in a tab stating musical artist). The references provided are credible and showcase his involvement and association with various notable people, projects and labels (under various pseudonyms and his real name) which make him suitable for a wiki page.I think the page should be called 0010x0010 since it's his most current and active profile. I couldn't find any notable films directed by him, but since IMDB mentions him as a director I thought it would be logical to add the title. I don't think this page should be deleted, but perhaps you have any suggestions to edit this page properly since there are so many pseudonyms and titles. Thank you very much ! xzis10z xzis10z 18:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharana Sree for deletion
There are some of the sources that i have collected from the respective person. Please check them all and me know if they can contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. Please have a look at this discussion page. Articles for deletion/Sharana Sree -- — ImTHOP  ( ♥~ℳe ) 17:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC +5.30)
 * . You can add WP:RS sources in the article. -- <b style="color:DeepSkyBlue">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  12:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Reversion of Edits on IVG Immobilien by 87.139.194.39
Hi, you reversed my edit of "IVG Immobilien". I just wanted to update the company names, since they both changed and that is relevant information. If you look at https://www.konii.de/news/ivg-institutional-funds-heisst-kunftig-triuva-201509227002 you will see that IVG Institutional Funds is now called TRIUVA and on http://www.storag-etzel.de/de/aktuelles/aktuelle-meldungen/detail/aktuelles/umfirmierung-zum-01072016-aus-ivg-caverns-wird-storag-etzel/hash/d43de8b99e28aca4ab0ec846e69d2483/ you can see that IVG Caverns is now called STORAG ETZEL. Greetings 87.139.194.39 (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Matthias

In Regards to Your Message
I'll take note of it. I'll make a similar edit later, and put some references up in regards to the facts.

Tsukuyomi Hikari (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I didn't add any useless information about Pantnagar, actually I live there and know about it. I just updated the information and didn't commented anything so please do your job and let me do mine. Abhiinav.18 (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Editing with wrong people
Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. It seems, some people here don't like you.

You must leave this biased project,  where they ban but allow  (master sock and edit warrior), extremely uncivil editors as  and. Take care of your life outside Wikipedia. Cheers.
 * Hey are you gonna believe him. I would suggest not!  Varun  FEB2003    08:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

CSD tagging
Hello Marvellous Spider-Man - thanks for your help today with CSD tagging. Just some advice for you - CSD U5 is better for user/user talk pages which are blatant WP:NOTWEBHOST violations (such as self-promotion), and A7 is for unremarkable persons (example: someone writing an article about themselves, or an article about a person with no claim to notability). I've edited two of your tags accordingly. Have a good day, Zero <sup style="color:#0000FF;">talk  11:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:Huggle don't have the option for A7. -- <b style="color:Aqua">Marvellous</b> <b style="color:LawnGreen">Spider</b> -Man 11:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It does. I'm not sure what it's called in full - "unremarkable person" perhaps? I don't CSD tag on HG - quicker on Twinkle - but I do counter-vandalism work on there frequently. Useful tool indeed. Anyway, do let me know if you cannot find the criterion, as I'll try and get on my computer to have a look. Zero <sup style="color:#0000FF;">talk  18:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

hey dude, you are pretty awesome but you deleted my comments ans im kinda salty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarongeoris (talk • contribs) 16:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Stadium in La Paz
Hello Marvellous Spider-Man, I've added a source to the official capacity of the stadium, what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.174.122 (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, you must identify reliable sources. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  07:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Is this a reliable source: http://www.resultados-futbol.com/clausura_peru/grupo1/equipos — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.174.122 (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Jt LeRoy
Hello there Marvelous Spider Man,

I will re try to edit with citations. I have put citations in and I have found my contributions edited regardless. Also, "The documentarian Jeff Feuerzeig co-produced, wrote, and directed a film documenting the scandal, titled Author: The JT LeRoy Story, which premiered in United States theaters in September of 2016" as no citation but does not get removed. How could that be the case? Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msturm 8 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello there again, I have continued to post with citations and they are all promptly being deleted for no reason. I'm keep my contributions factual. I have included an update about Dr. Owens with a citation and it is promptly being removed. I have always felt that the JT LeRoy is very biased and doesn't represent the history of the scandal.

I so would appreciate your help on the best way to proceed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msturm 8 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lola Bessis


A tag has been placed on Lola Bessis, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4178963. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 07:29, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

NPR
Thank you for patrolling new pages. Please do not use Higgle for this - it's not what Huggle was designed for and you will get your patrols wrong as you did at Emam Ali (Musician). To correctly patrol pages, you must perfectly understand WP:NPP and use the NewPagesFeed or do it mnnaually withTwinkle. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't patrol that page with Huggle. I marked it for speedy deletion. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  08:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * - --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * , Yes I used Huggle to tag it for speedy deletion. Huggle must have some codes which might have automatically patrolled the page. If you check revision history I marked it for speedy deletion again. The editor was removing the speedy deletion tag. I didn't patrol the page. <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  09:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Plese do not use Huggle for patrolling new pages. The first tag you made was wrong. New Page Patrolling is something we have to start getting right, and that's why we've introduced the New Page Reviewer right. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It'll be hard to avoid patrolling new pages while still tagging/reverting/etc. them if Huggle somehow automatically patrols them. Huggle doesn't seem to have an option to disable patrolling edits, new pages or not.  However, I do note that Special:BotPasswords (which can be used to login to Huggle) does have an option to disable patrolling edits.  However, I believe that page can only assign "bots" (They're really just ways to limit an external application's ability to interact with Wikipedia using your account, not actual Wikipedia bots.) permissions that the users they're under already have, regardless of whatever checkboxes are checked.  So if we're somehow marking pages as patrolled without having the user right, it's not through that.  —  Gestrid  ( talk ) 05:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * No one, not even a bot, can mark a page as 'patrolled'. However, editors who repeatedly use Huggle to tag pages too quickly and/or incorrectly, are likely to find themselves losing the right to use it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, that makes sense. Above, it sounded like we were somehow able to tag pages as 'patrolled' when using Huggle.  What you just said is something I now specifically try to avoid after the first warning I got.  —  Gestrid  ( talk ) 15:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Langtree Park
Hi, please put my sourced edit back at Langtree Park and remove the warning template from my talk page. Thanks 2A02:C7D:89A3:F400:31DE:534:CC6D:F95D (talk) 14:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Done, I googled and found the park is indeed named as Totally wicked stadium. I mistook it as vandalism. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b>  Spider-Man  14:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

grammar point
Hi dear dude Could please tell me what's the difference between "have to" and "gonna have to"? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alborzagros (talk • contribs) 10:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Both are almost same. gonna have to is more informal and implies urgency. You can ask in Reference desk/Language. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  10:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

thanksAlborzagros (talk) 10:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Michael Wolff
Kindly explain how my addition to the "Criticism" section of Wolff's page (notwithstanding the edit of the journalist hyperlink) was in any way more "disruptive" or a form of "soapboxing" than the current language on the page. Please and thank you. --Cooler710 (talk) 03:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You were inserting Twitter links from your own twitter account which is not allowed in Wikipedia. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  03:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Article
I talked to the actual author of that image I removed and he said it was highly inarticulately drawn. It should not be there. I can take a screenshot of my email and put it on the web if needed be. I still have the email. Shoakhanmk (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You can change the image after uploading new correct image according to Wikipedia's image upload process, but you can't blank the entire section of that article. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  16:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's inaccurate, I don't see why not? I don't have and image. Just that the author that originally created that image said it was incorrectly drawn up (it was originally from a book, and a wiki user made his own interpretation from it.). Why should it stay? I'm just removing anything that has to do with that image. Nothing else from that article page. Shoakhanmk (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Meg Hall
Hello Marvellous Spider-Man. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Meg Hall as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because having roles in notable TV programmes is a credible indication of "importance or significance". Remember that CSD A7 is a lower standard than what is required to demonstrate notability – it does not, for example, require that the article's text already contain citations to reliable sources that would be necessary to prove notability, but only that it contain a claim that, were it true, might reasonably make the subject a valid encyclopaedia topic (if proper sourcing could later be found). Adam9007 (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Beau Davidson
Hi -- the source for the controversy is the YouTube video I linked to. I'll do this again and add a second source. Please consider taking action against "BeauDavidson" who is editing his own Wikipedia entry, which is an obvious conflict of interest.
 * Then add a secondary source instead of YouTube. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  01:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

I did not realize that a link to a YouTube video was not good enough. I will now remove anything in the entry that relies solely on a YouTube link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:D081:5100:2D9F:8E42:6EF5:27B6 (talk) 01:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi- the youtube video in question is a violation of applicable copyright laws, and was removed via its original source- Soundcloud, for copyright infringement. User Chris Caesar is intentionally editing the Beau Davidson page in an attempt to defame and slander Mr. Davidson, and is evident of libel, slander, and defamation. Caesar is not using a logged in username, because he does not want to be identified, but his content was removed from facebook to this exact Medium blog, classified as "hate speech." That is two sites now that have removed his content in a blatant effort defame a well-known artist and respected songwriter. Please ensure that his IP no longer can edit the Beau Davidson page, as he is intentionally doing this, and is about to receive legal action for this harassment. See twitter @ChrisCaesar and the aforementioned Medium blog, which may be removed due to community standard and privacy violations.
 * I request both the editors to discuss on article talk page and then visit WP:DRN and file a new request. There is a neutral volunteer who will listen to both parties and take a neutral decision according to WP:NPOV. <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  05:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Marvellous Spider-Man: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers,  Class 455 ( Merry Christmas! ) 17:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
 * thanks, and have a great Christmas. <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  03:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Articles and notability
Just dropping a note since I've seen come up a couple of times in your AfD nominations. As a rule, articles don't pass or fail GNG. Subjects pass or fail GNG. For a subject to fail notability, is a general statement about all the sources that exist in the world at a given time. On the other hand, what the article does is demonstrate notability by showing what kinds of sources are out there.

That might just be mixing up words, but it is important to note that what you are evaluating at AfD is the topic, not the state of the article. Timothy Joseph Wood 18:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Marvellous Spider-Man!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Marvellous Spider-Man, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

 Class 455 ( talk  | stand clear of the doors!)''' 18:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

New Page Reviewer
Hello Marvellous Spider-Man. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

NPP coord
Please read the instructions - it stands to reason that coordinator sshould already be New Page Patrollers. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

User rights
I have removed your user-rights as requested. When you would like them back, you are welcome to ask. I am not expecting anyone to single-handedly get rid of that new page patrol backlog. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Samm Hodges
Hello! I had a question - I edited an article about my husband (added sources since there was a proposed deletion based on lack of sources), and now the article (Samm Hodges) has a neutrality warning. Did I do something wrong? Kathrynmhodges (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The editor has noticed that your username ends with Hodges like Samm Hodges. Wikipedia has some policies about conflict of interest. You have to Identify reliable sources to improve the article. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  17:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Page deletion Equatorial Ultravox
Sir equatorial Ultravox have no page on WikiPedia .So please let me add a page for it. Azraelwiki27 (talk) 03:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Sharlene Taulé) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sharlene Taulé, Marvellous Spider-Man!

Wikipedia editor Kostas20142 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article, good sources coverage. I apologize on behalf of everybody for the very late review"

To reply, leave a comment on Kostas20142's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kostas20142 (talk) 13:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Block
If you change your mind put the following at the bottom of your talk page as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->

You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it. That will send me an alert. <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  07:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC) -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  13:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I should not revert my changes as i am absolutely.How can you do so?You should first read carefully what i have changed then proceed as you wish.Lord ram was not only a historical human personality but supreme god of hinduism and being a hindu i very well know every bit of lord's life.You must allow me to make changes.Also suggest me how i can become wikipedia administrator. Aman Kumar Tiwari (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

sorry one mistake replace i with you. Aman Kumar Tiwari (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

RfA

 * I hope that you return to editing when you are ready. Thanks. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  22:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

i want to become admin. Aman Kumar Tiwari (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

NPR
Hi. I have reverted your PROD on Dr. Seeta Kulkarni. It is essential to use the correct deletion criterion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

NPR
Hi. I have reverted your CSD tag on Greeman Software Solution Private Limited. It is essential to use the correct deletion criterion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Greeman Software Solution Private Limited was deleted twice by . And I can't find enough reliable sources for Seeta Kulkarni. -- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  06:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You tagged Greeman Software Solution Private Limited with CSD-A7 DB-Corp. I reverted and retagged it with G-11 Advertising. It was blatantly promotional. It's important to always use the correct template because we are constantly running statistics on the reasons why articles are deleted. If you're not sure what criterion to use, either leave it for someone else, or ask me (probably best), but don't hazard a guess. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Susie Abromeit


Hello, Marvellous Spider-Man. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susie Abromeit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Rapkingk warnings
I left this user a level-three warning about promotional behavior: you followed it up with a level four warning, despite no new edits having been made. This is verging on bitey behavior, and also dilutes the effect of the warnings. Please be a bit more careful. Vanamonde (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * He was doing this in other pages as Spoken word, and Desi hip hop, made yesterday but not reverted which wasn't noticed by anybody? There was not so bitey about one day old editor whose only edits was to promote his band.-- <b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b> Spider-Man  16:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The issue is not with the level four warning. If you had left that yesterday, immediately after those edits, it would not have been a problem. The issue is with leaving a new warning despite no new edits. The correct process for a promotional editor is to revert, warn, and wait. If they repeat the behavior, warn them again: if they've received a level four warning already, report them. If their behavior is egregious, you can skip warning levels, as indeed I did. But our warnings are meant to stop bad behavior. If no bad edits occur after a warning, yet another warning is BITEY. Vanamonde (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I'm Jason Smith. I got your message recently. I just wanted to know some more knowledge that you know that I could learn on how to use Wikipedia. User:Jason Trafford Smith

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Seána Kerslake) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Seána Kerslake, Marvellous Spider-Man!

Wikipedia editor Gaioa just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good, she appears to be just about notable enough - having starred in (at least) one notable award-winning film, and having a recognition by herself. But please do expand it and fix it - she is 'best known' for a film that is not linked=not notable?"

To reply, leave a comment on Gaioa's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

Ways to improve Lili Beaudoin
Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Marvellous Spider-Man, thanks for creating Lili Beaudoin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Need more than just references to the award for this. any additional detail other than this?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

—  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  05:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.