User talk:Mary1783

July 2017
Hello, I'm Grayfell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magora (November 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Magora Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Magora reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   11:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with Magora page improvements. I have done the changes to provide the refreshed draft of the page, but not sure, that everything is correctly placed (I mean links at the bottom of the page) or any other technical moments... Thanks for your detailed remarks - what should be corrected and how.

Mary1783 (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Both the references and the text will need several kinds of work.
 * The vast majority of your references are not reliable third-party sources covering the company in some detail. Some are business directories or web stores, quite a few are Wikipedia itself, at least one is an interview with company personnel. CNN and the Telegraph are reliable sources of the kind we're looking for, but they both devote a half-sentence each to Magora; that's not the depth of coverage we need to establish that the company is notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. Most of the current references probably should be removed outright and replaced by better ones - newspapers or reputable tech magazines reporting on Magora in some detail.
 * The references currently consist of bare URLs which are easily subject to link rot. (Some of them are cut so short that the wiki software doesn't even recognize them as URLs, too.) You should provide metadata such as the title, publisher, date, and author, when available. The reviewer gave you a link to WP:Referencing for beginners; the videos at that page explain how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes that contain all that metadata.
 * The draft's content will need heavy editing to bring it in line with what the references actually say. For example, none of the five sources given for the following sentence confirms even a tiny bit of the claims about Magora:
 * Within five years since its launch, Magora gained the trust of reputed [8] international clients such as Unilever, Trivago [9], Sberbank [10], and Yandex and built up capacity to become a full-service outsourcing [11] developer with a track record of custom solutions [12].
 * The tone is blatantly promotional; the sentence above is a good example of that problem, too.
 * Wikipedia does not consider itself a reliable source; it should not be used as a reference. Links to other Wikipedia articles merely serve as a convenience for our readers who may want to read more about a related topic. Thus such links should not be put into footnotes but added to the body of the article itself. See Help:Links; in short, links to Wikipedia articles are created by double square brackets.  will give: Dog. Huon (talk) 09:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magora (December 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Magora Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bradv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Magora reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v  16:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)