User talk:MaryKember2011

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Simon Diamond, you may be blocked from editing.  Crash Under  ride  13:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 09:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Randy Orton
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Randy Orton), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! WannaBeEditor (talk) 02:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to the page Jeremy Borash appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gunner & Murphy


A tag has been placed on Gunner & Murphy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarita and Taylor Wilde


The article Sarita and Taylor Wilde has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Morgan and Crimson


The article Matt Morgan and Crimson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 03:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Please improve your current articles or risk having them deleted because notability and solidity has not been easily Established. SwisterTwister   talk  03:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chavo & Hernandez


The article Chavo & Hernandez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * TNA tag team that was together for about a year and did not come up with a name. Not every tag team who won the belts are notable enough to warrant an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle


The article A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Omni Flames  let's talk about it  07:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle. Since you had some involvement with the A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)