User talk:MaryMehrk031

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Wolf
Hello MaryMehrk031,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aaron Wolf for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kaitymh (talk) 21:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Howling Wolf Productions


A tag has been placed on Howling Wolf Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 03:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Wolf


A tag has been placed on Aaron Wolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 03:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Promotional articles
I'm writing because I noticed that you are creating some articles in places that could be seen as very promotional in tone. For example, I've deleted the information you placed on your userpage as well as on the userpage for User:HowlingWolfProd, as it was promotional in tone and is considered to be a misuse of your userspace. Phrases like "HWP principals Aaron Wolf and Tim Nuttall, working with a talented team of Los Angeles- and New York-based film professionals, pride themselves on their proven ability to produce quality films for all genres and all budgets." are incredibly inappropriate to add to Wikipedia. Adding them to various different userspaces, even if you might have been the previous editor or have their permission, is extremely inappropriate. It's still promotional and can lead to you getting blocked as a promotion only account.

Since I am fairly certain that you are someone who has been asked to edit on behalf of the company and you're possibly the same user that was editing under HowlingWolfProd, I would like to ask that you read over our basic guidelines for notability (WP:GNG) as well as our conflict of interest policy (WP:COI). I will post something that gives a basic overview of it.

The other issue I notice is that you are adding a lot of articles centering about Aaron Wolf. I would like to politely ask that you refrain from this until you have read over our notability guidelines a little more. I would also like to ask that you possibly get someone to help you create the pages, someone who is more familiar with the editing process and can verify sources and confirm that something passes notability guidelines. I see where you seem to be trying to be less promotional, but there are still issues with sourcing, editing, and the like. The problem is that re-adding the pages doesn't guarantee that every issue will be fixed and constantly re-adding them can be seen as spam (at worst) and at best it's not constructive to you and the company you're representing.

I'll see what I can do with the pages, but for right now it'd be best to stop and read over our basic policies. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, MaryMehrk031. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Wolf


A tag has been placed on Aaron Wolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Howling wolf productions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howling wolf productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Howling wolf productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fuddle (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)