User talk:MaryNato

February 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Michael Buckley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —TreasuryTag —t —c 16:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ama-ron


The article Ama-ron has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The sources referenced below do not even mention 'Ama-ron'. There are no other reliable secondary sources that can be used to verify if this 'Ama-ron', legendary or otherwise, even exists at all. This means the Wiki entry fails to satisfy the verifiability and notability guidelines. Also, it appears that the author of this article MaryNato has a negative reputation regarding his/her contributions to Wikipedia, judging from the content of his/her talk page. For example, a fellow Wiki editor named Esanchez7587 called the user out for the 'unconstructive edits'. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that this Wiki entry is just one of MaryNato's several unconstructive edits."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stricnina (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)