User talk:MaryTanner

---



Please put new entries at the BOTTOM OF THE PAGE

Marilyn Mosley
Please take a look at the article again, and it should speak for itself.--Aichik (talk) 22:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Patience Rwabwogo


A tag has been placed on Patience Rwabwogo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dog  six  (talk) 02:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jaerock Lee, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''

In this edit you changed a working URL in order for it to become unreachable. This is completely inappropriate. bonadea'' contributions talk 09:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Reverted your recent edit.
Just to let you know, I reverted your edit at Trinity. There didn't appear to be any new information added, and regardless, a video of a sermon from a Christian video site isn't a reliable source for a citation. It could be construed as vandalism, and/or promotional POV (given that the video invokes prayer and whatnot), but I'm assuming good faith on your part. If you believe you have a valid reason for including the material, and/or that it somehow meets RS requirements, please discuss it on the talk page before attempting to add it again. Thank you. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 10:33, 7 March 2015 (UTC)