User talk:Maryannelindemann/Ethics of torture

Hi, i just reviewed the contributions you made to this article. I believe the contributions were great and provided great insight on the topic at hand. the only suggestion I have is the content added to the premise section needs a little more clarity within the wording to make those who aren't philosophy majors a little easier for them to read. In addition to the History section in my opinion should maybe be placed in an alternative part of the history section or be removed since the section discusses illegality and while your discusses the transition of legal to illegal and the consequences.

WCI Review
There seems to be an issue with the balanced coverage in the edited sections. There are only three sources given for this where, in order to give balanced points of view, as well as describing the minority point of view, there needs to be far more sources listed. I see that the student editor did add some sources as the original did not give any, but adding more sources and describing different points of view will give it a fuller feel. It's great that the utilitarian POV is given for the premise but the addition of other school of thought would be beneficial. Now, this is not to say that student editor is at fault for their additions to the article, the problem largely lies with what was already written, but the addition a lot of point of views, including those who might be in favor of something as abhorrent as torture, might give the article a better balance of coverage.

Deanschepisi (talk) 14:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)