User talk:Maryester

Welcome!
Hello, Maryester, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Ashkenazi Jews
Hi! I'm contacting you in regard to. Please note, that all venues of dispute resolution on Wikipedia require prior talk page discussion. This means that you have to raise your concerns on talk:Ashkenazi Jews and discuss the problem with another editor before applying to WP:DRN or whatever forum you prefer. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 02:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Your recent editing history at Ashkenazi Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Normal admins cannot overturn Checkuser-based blocks, especially if the result is Likely or Confirmed (meaning everything the Checkuser uncovers - not just the IP - matches up). Contact WP:BASC. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that the block I imposed was simply a routine implementation of the SPI. Plus of course the nonsense about me claiming I'm Jewish but being secretly anti-Semite. But there's nothing to review here. Dougweller (talk) 20:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

I do not remember saying that about, or to you directly. Where was that? I said that is a standard method not directed at you per-seMaryester (talk) 21:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * You wrote " Or anti-Semitic points of view though they pretend to be Jews, such as Dougweller or Galassi (many others)." Also "Dougweller and Galassi are defending an anti-Semitic, racist point of view." and "causes Dougweller to take revenge and block me". As I said, acted on the SPI and blocked various socks. Nothing to do with your edits. Your other acccusations suggest you don't particularly care about facts or investigate before making personal attacks. Dougweller (talk) 05:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I do not remember saying that. I meant to say present themselves as having a neutral point of view on the Jews, yet are defending an anti-Jewish point of view. I dont care if you are Jewish or not. Though I have been pushed around here, my points were well investigated, and will remain right.Maryester (talk) 06:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Also what am I supposed to think when I add the only two enc. references to a place that said citation needed? And they are removed because "they do not mention the rhineland". This is clearly an abuse of power by you (dougweller), and in fact defending a racist point of view (eugenics) even if others agree, you are still wrong. The line says Germany then mentions the area, putting a reference to Germany, at the end of the line enhances the readability. This type of absolutely uncommon nitpicking on wikipedis (happens nowhere else) in a just rather than a wild west encyclopedia, would without any doubt leave you suspect, to a blinkblink support for in this case a racist perspective. Eugenics is racism not bigotry.

As a whole of all legitimate groups, by today's standards, wikipedia is by far least sensitive to the Jews. Because those who outnumber them here, 'democratically' are pretending to be sane, with false statements.Maryester (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I am not saying you are racist necessarily, I am just saying that you had supported that pov.Maryester (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk page blocked
As this editor can't be unblocked by another Admin, after discussion I'm blocking talk page access. Instructions as to what to do to get unblocked (contact WP:BASC} have already been mentioned. Dougweller (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom unblock appeal
The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock at this time. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.

For the Arbitration Committee.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  09:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crucifixion In Arabia concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crucifixion In Arabia, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Crucifixion In Arabia


Hello Maryester. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Crucifixion In Arabia.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)