User talk:Marylee1234

Your contributed article, Gonubalabala Island


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gonubalabala Island. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gonabarabara Island. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gonabarabara Island – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JamesG5 (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gonubalabala Island, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 06:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kal spelletich


A tag has been placed on Kal spelletich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nerd1a4i (talk) 19:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...contested speedy deletion of a biography of a living person. What is the reason for removal? This page adhered to wikipedia's guidelines for neutral point of view, verifiability and no original research. The tone was neutral, the in line citations were from verifiable sources (NY Times articles, gallery links) and the page had no original research.

Marylee1234 (talk) 04:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * moved the article to Draft:Kal spelletich, where deleted it for not stating the importance of Kat. I'm not sure why, as that particular "speedy deletion" criterion isn't supposed to apply to drafts, which are being worked on. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @  04:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I was chewed on for removing a CSD tag before, so I left it with a holdon. It appears to be at Draft:Kal spelletich and is not deleted now. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  07:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...why a draft page on Kal Spelletich was removed. Thanks

Marylee1234 (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like your page is at Draft:Kal spelletich. If you ever lose track of one of your contribs, you can always click the "Contributions" link at the top of the page. It will show you all of your past edits (with lots of customization like only looking at the edits where you created a page). Primefac (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

What's the process for a draft page to be reviewed for publishing?
Once I've completed a draft page, who reviews? How do I ask for review? Thank you!

Marylee1234 (talk) 05:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You put at the top of the page you wish reviewed. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 07:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. Your recent edit to List of American artists 1900 and after appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   19:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kal Spelletich


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kal Spelletich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  General Ization  Talk   19:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Kal Spelletich by Robert Herrick (2017).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kal Spelletich by Robert Herrick (2017).png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kal Spelletich FireShower.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kal Spelletich FireShower.jpg, which you've attributed to Kal Spelletich. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

This also applies to File:Kal Spelletich, Intention Machines, Prayer Wheel.jpg, File:Kal Spelletich Split Brain Robotics Front View.jpg and File:Kal Spelletich Flight Simulator 2001.jpg. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kal Spelletich by Robert Herrick (2017).png
Thanks for uploading File:Kal Spelletich by Robert Herrick (2017).png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Marylee1234 (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)