User talk:Marynic

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Corporal punishment in the home has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Corporal punishment in the home was changed by Marynic (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91612 on 2014-04-02T15:58:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corporal punishment in the home with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Corporal punishment in the home with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 17:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

NSPCC
Hello, I saw your posts on Corporal punishment in the home and I also see that you are new to Wikipedia, so I may be able to offer some guidance.

Because wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the text needs to maintain a certain style and flow. It cannot, for example, have text that overtly contradicts earlier text, such as part of bit you posted.

Also, any text in the main article space needs to have a public source of some kind that others can verify. For example a link to a website, a published book, or professional journal. Books and journals are allowed even if they are not "free" on the internet, but they must have a proper bibliographic citation. Private e-mails do not count because there is no way to independently verify that they are authentic. Furthermore, some sources are superior to others in terms of authority and reliability. Blogs are generally frowned upon as sources because anyone can write a blog, even crackpots. Journals and government publications are considered very authoritative because they have been subjected to some kind of rigor or oversight.

Now, I was able to find verification that the CEO of NSPCC did make that statement here in this link. However, there is still a problem. NSPCC is a charity, not a legal authority or government entity. Peter Wanless has no legal authority to be making the statement he did, even if it was made with the purest intentions. If the text is to be changed, it will need some kind of legal source, such as statutes of the law or a major court case (I'm not too familiar with how UK law works.Legitimus (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I read the text you posted for me. It has decent sourcing, but now the matter is how you want the text of the article itself to be changed using this information.  Is there a specific problem with the article as it stands now, that needs correcting? Legitimus (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah that I understand and I will see what I can do.Legitimus (talk) 01:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Corporal punishment in the home
Alright I did some digging into UK law. I am a bit out my element because I'm in the US and our legal system is different. But I was able to find the laws themselves. They are a bit confusing but I will attempt to summarize them in the article. I'm going to place the law links here for convenience so you can read them as well.Legitimus (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31/section/58 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/18 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/47 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/23-24/12/section/1#section-1-4