User talk:Maryogden

Bob Day
Hi Maryogden, you might not be aware of this but your continued editing of Bob Day without regard to consensus and accepted Wikipedia standards (eg. WP:VERIFY, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR) is considered edit warring (see WP:EDITWARRING). Please consider familarising yourself with these four links to Wikipedia guidelines before trying to force any new edits into Bob Day. Cheers, Donama (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am not familiar with Wikipedia protocols but know biased reporting when I see it. Hence my attempt to put things into context (Maryogden (talk) 05:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)).
 * No problems, not trying to be overtly political or biased here, just wishing to maintain the article quality and integrity here on Wikipedia, difficult as that is with such an open project. Note that to avoid editorial bias we rely on the WP:NPOV (neutral point of view) pillar and you really ought to read that. Also more nuanced guidelines such as WP:UNDUE (avoid undue weight) are useful. Donama (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If that is true why do you and Timeshift9 insist on deleting the relevant fact (from the same Age article) that Bob Day's Party received an equivalent amount in public funding to the amount he lent to the Party? If Bob Day wants to lend money to Family First for a campaign in which he is one of the candidates and the Party then recoups an equivalent amount in public funding can you and Timeshift9 not see that is relevant? The loan and public funding are not unrelated. (Maryogden (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC))
 * Information that's not about Bob Day shouldn't be in the article about him. That you think the fact that FFP got some public funding following the election is relevant to Day's article is your opinion, but we respectfully disagree. Donama (talk) 00:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)