User talk:Marysediamondis

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Bass (pornstar)
Hello Marysediamondis,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Bass (pornstar) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xpctr8 (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jake Bass (pornographic actor)


The article Jake Bass (pornographic actor) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails PORNBIO and the GNG: no qualifying awards, no independent reliable sourcing. Virtually all content is promotional and/or drawn from promotional sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jake Bass for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Bass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jake Bass (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)