User talk:Mas868

October 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Crowd simulation, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crowd tracking
Hello Mas868,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Crowd tracking for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JackTracker (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Please observe context for what you are editing
There is a real world application section! I moved your Uses content there, please add content and references to it insteading of putting uses everywhere else. Qd33 cs (talk) 02:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crowd tracking


The article Crowd tracking has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Almost entirely original research, peacocking, POV"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 16:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)