User talk:Masalou2000

@ Catflap08 and Ogress Hello. I see that the edit I made was removed, I am assuming due to the citation. I understand that the lead typically should have listed controversial issues to give an unbiased view. Nichirenism definitely is a part of the history of Nichiren Buddhism in Japan and I believed should be mentioned if controversial subjects are a necessity in the lead. However, it should be noted that Nichirenism and Nichiren Buddhist support for WWII (which was common throughout Buddhist sects during WWII) was a minor occurrence in the discourse and the over 700 year history of Nichiren Buddhism and is an insignificant fact in comparison to the rest of the lead. In terms of facts, it is a minor event when accounting the whole history of Nichiren Buddhism. I believe this is what the lead should be focused on if it is to truly show the summary of Nichiren Buddhism. The basis warranting its mention would solely be mentioning controversial topics, regardless to how minor they are in Nichiren Buddhist history. Nichiren Shu and the SGI, significant, defining Nichiren Buddhist denominations (I didn't add the Rissho Kosei Kai, which is Nichiren influenced but certainly not a Nichiren Buddhist denomination; or Nichiren Shoshu which focuses on spreading peace through propagation of Nichiren Buddhism exclusively) are known for the peace efforts opposing war as is common within Buddhism in contemporary times. I think it is therefore, important that Nichiren Buddhism is widely known for valuing peace in contemporary times if Nichirenism is mentioned. Perhaps it would not seem to go "against" the controversial sentences if it is placed before it. Also, it may be important to note that Nichirenism and the contemporary stances on peace all stem from an interpretation of the the Rissho Ankoku Ron as pro Japanese Nationalism (establish the true teaching for the protection of Japan, and that religion serves national interest foremost), or instead pro human rights emphasizing that the people define the country (thus he used an altered character for the word "country" in this writings, the center which is now a character used for the word "democracy"). Furthermore is the role he was said to play during the Mongol invasion. Thoughts and response please.
 * Recent history has a heavier weight sometimes. Not mentioning Nichirenism would be undue weight given its historical importance. Ogress smash! 02:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Ogress In this case, it doesn't if you know about Nichiren Buddhism. It is more of a "tainting" occurrence in the history by radical extremist. Please read the edits above (I wrote it too fast and just changed my message to you). Therefore, I think it should be mentioned what Nichiren Buddhism is known for today. Let's keep in mind that 1932 was much longer in the past than today.
 * No. WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT applies here. Ogress smash! 02:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Ogress Your proof? If you placed there, let's see your argument. I have placed mine.
 * @ Masalou2000 get your history right.--Catflap08 (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

@ Catflap08 Thank you for your replies. It is evident that your of facts are slanted towards a stance, and not worthy to be counted as unbiased within a subject area. That is all I needed to know. I will keep that in mind with my interactions with you both.